Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire.

Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and at the same time the evolution of fiduciary law is also providing something quite different – creating the distinction between doing things right or complying with the legal rules, and doing the right thing. Doing the right thing, or a guiding sense of social purpose, is what is needed if the market system is able to continue to have enormous potential.

These are the views of Ed Waitzer, who is professor and Jarislowsky Dimma Mooney Chair in Corporate Governance at the Osgoode Law School at York University in Toronto, who believes that the finance sector should be proactive in shaping the trend.

He says that the trajectory of the law is clear, that regulators and legislators (and courts) are expanding fiduciary duties based on reasonable expectations that the financial sector should serve the public interest.

In an article in the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management last fall, he and co-author Douglas Saro, who is an associate of Sullivan and Cromwell, outline five initiatives that they believe if implemented “would materially raise the perception and reality of the financial sector’s social utility around the world”.

  1. Rethink fiduciary duty. The fiduciary of the future will recognise and follow through on responsibilities to preserve and support the institutional system in which the fiduciary is embedded, including a duty to ensure that externalities are properly priced and moral failures are addressed. This will require a shift away from the zero-sum perspective that for a financial institution to win the client must lose, and toward a fiduciary culture with a clearly articulated and generally accepted public purpose.
  2. Foster win/win collaborations. This includes collaborations between investors and corporations and the sharing of costs between multiple parties.
  3. Create legal mechanisms to protect future generations
  4. Rethink regulation
  5. Reassert the social utility of the financial sector.

The article Reconnecting the financial sector to the real economy – a plan for action outlines how institutions can shift from reactive to proactive regulatory and compliance strategies.

Sponsored Content

Ed Waitzer will speak about fiduciary duty and law at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at the Chicago Booth School of Business from October 18-20.

He will speak on a panel regarding fiduciary responsibility alongside:

Sharan Burrow, general secretary, International Trade Union Confederation

Colin Melvin, chief executive, Hermes EOS

Beth Richtman, portfolio manager – infrastructure and global governance, CalPERS

Martin Skancke, chair of PRI and chair of the expert group on investments in coal and petroleum companies, appointed by the Norwegian Ministry of Finance

www.fiduciaryinvestors.com

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

How to estimate the equity risk premium

Given the importance of equity risk premium, it is surprising how haphazard the estimation of equity risk premiums remains in practice. This paper by Aswath Damodaran at the New York University Stern School of Business examines a number of different approaches to determining the equity risk premium and why different approaches yield different values. It

Previous