Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire.

Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and at the same time the evolution of fiduciary law is also providing something quite different – creating the distinction between doing things right or complying with the legal rules, and doing the right thing. Doing the right thing, or a guiding sense of social purpose, is what is needed if the market system is able to continue to have enormous potential.

These are the views of Ed Waitzer, who is professor and Jarislowsky Dimma Mooney Chair in Corporate Governance at the Osgoode Law School at York University in Toronto, who believes that the finance sector should be proactive in shaping the trend.

He says that the trajectory of the law is clear, that regulators and legislators (and courts) are expanding fiduciary duties based on reasonable expectations that the financial sector should serve the public interest.

In an article in the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management last fall, he and co-author Douglas Saro, who is an associate of Sullivan and Cromwell, outline five initiatives that they believe if implemented “would materially raise the perception and reality of the financial sector’s social utility around the world”.

  1. Rethink fiduciary duty. The fiduciary of the future will recognise and follow through on responsibilities to preserve and support the institutional system in which the fiduciary is embedded, including a duty to ensure that externalities are properly priced and moral failures are addressed. This will require a shift away from the zero-sum perspective that for a financial institution to win the client must lose, and toward a fiduciary culture with a clearly articulated and generally accepted public purpose.
  2. Foster win/win collaborations. This includes collaborations between investors and corporations and the sharing of costs between multiple parties.
  3. Create legal mechanisms to protect future generations
  4. Rethink regulation
  5. Reassert the social utility of the financial sector.

The article Reconnecting the financial sector to the real economy – a plan for action outlines how institutions can shift from reactive to proactive regulatory and compliance strategies.

Sponsored Content

Ed Waitzer will speak about fiduciary duty and law at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at the Chicago Booth School of Business from October 18-20.

He will speak on a panel regarding fiduciary responsibility alongside:

Sharan Burrow, general secretary, International Trade Union Confederation

Colin Melvin, chief executive, Hermes EOS

Beth Richtman, portfolio manager – infrastructure and global governance, CalPERS

Martin Skancke, chair of PRI and chair of the expert group on investments in coal and petroleum companies, appointed by the Norwegian Ministry of Finance

www.fiduciaryinvestors.com

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

Previous