Investor survey reveals disappointing year for hedge fund returns

Hedge funds had a disappointing year, according to a study by UK-based alternative assets research firm Preqin that reveals 40 per cent of investors surveyed feel that returns on their investments have failed to meet expectations in the past 12 months.

The survey of 50 institutional investors also shows that just 11 per cent feel that returns from their investments exceeded expectations in the past 12 months. Investors also report that issues of hedge fund transparency and fees are still a concern.

The results come on the back of some asset owners looking to boost their allocation to hedge funds in light of recent volatility in equity markets and near-record low yields on some government bonds.

As part of the study Preqin also sorted information from 2000 single-manager hedge funds to track management and performance fee data.

When it comes to fund managers, it seems that the number of funds charging the traditional 2/20 fee structure continues to decline, down to 29 per cent of managers surveyed.

The mean management fee was 1.6 per cent and the mean performance fee reported was 19.2 per cent.

Sponsored Content

Across all managers, 79 per cent charged 20 per cent performance fees; and 40 per cent of managers reported charging a 2 per cent management fee.

Preqin found that the proportion of investors who believed returns exceeded or were in line with expectations had fallen by 11 percentage points to 60 per cent since 2010.

This represents the lowest proportion in the past four years. In addition, 28 per cent of investors reported that returns have failed to meet their expectations since 2010.

Preqin hedge fund data manager Amy Bensted (pictured) says dissatisfaction with hedge fund performance will be of concern to the industry, but notes that funds are continuing to provide flexibility when it comes to fees.

“Changes to the hedge fund industry are likely to continue apace as cautious institutional investors seek the best possible fund terms from their fund managers,” Bensted says.

“Fees are of great importance to investors, and it is probable that managers will carry on moving away from the two-and-20 structure. Dissatisfaction with hedge fund performance will be of concern to the industry, and managers will have to listen to their clients to ensure that they keep them on side.”

After struggling to attract investors after the financial crisis, with investors wary about transparency and liquidity issues, it would seem that hedge funds are gaining back lost ground when it comes to negotiating power.

The number of investors that reported that terms and conditions have shifted in their favour over the past 12 months dropped dramatically.

In 2010, 65 per cent of investors reported improvements in their terms and conditions, compared to just 35 per cent this year. This year 65 per cent reported no change in their terms and conditions.

But fees seem to be less of a make-or-break issue for investors than in previous years, with 47 per cent surveyed this year saying they had rejected a fund-based fee structure in the past 12 months. This compared to 65 per cent in 2010.

One-third of investors reported that managers were prepared to charge lower fees in return for longer lock-up periods.

Bensted says managers that are prepared to be flexible on fees and conditions are more likely to attract investors, particularly in light of the dissatisfaction reported by investors over fund returns.

“If managers continue to respond to demands from institutional investors, positive inflows will remain in the industry, with the managers best able to adapt to the demands of investors reaping the largest rewards,” Bensted says.

Half of investors said they would like to see improvements in the transparency of hedge funds, but at the same time, 44 per cent said they had seen the most improvement in this area over the past 12 months.

Performance fees were also an area almost half of respondents wanted improvements in; only 11 per cent reported seeing the most improvement in this area from hedge funds.

More than a third of funds were also concerned about redemption fees, and 17 per cent were concerned about lock-up periods.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous