Hong Kong’s MPF member info boost

Members in the HK$365 billion ($46.8 billion) Mandatory Provident Fund, which is expected to triple in size in the next 10 years, have a new comparison tool to help them decide their service provider and investment options.

Towers Watson has launched the online comparison tool and a supporting quarterly magazine specifically targeting MPF members ahead of the implementation of the “employee choice arrangement”.

The MPF, which was started in 2000, consists of dozens of schemes operated by service provider organisations. Members receive a tax deduction for their contributions but in the past year there has been an intensifying lobbying effort to improve the attractiveness of the scheme.

For instance, in a survey of members last year, more than 60 per cent said they would contribute more if employers were willing to match their contributions or if the tax-deductible limits were raised.

Naomi Denning, Hong Kong-based managing director of investment services for Towers Watson Asia Pacific, said the objective of the tool was to encourage a long-term approach by investors, as well as proving them with the information to make appropriate choices.

Research by Towers Watson has shown that the top three drivers of member decisions were the service providers’ “brand”, past performance and fees. Other research has shown that brand and past performance, at least, offer no guide to future performance. This situation is likely to be exacerbated when the employee choice arrangement, which makes for easier switching, comes into force later this year, although there will also be greater competition between service providers.

Sponsored Content

The portal address is: www.mpfexpress.com. The magazine will be available as a PDF on the site as well as in hard copy.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous