Hong Kong’s MPF member info boost

Members in the HK$365 billion ($46.8 billion) Mandatory Provident Fund, which is expected to triple in size in the next 10 years, have a new comparison tool to help them decide their service provider and investment options.

Towers Watson has launched the online comparison tool and a supporting quarterly magazine specifically targeting MPF members ahead of the implementation of the “employee choice arrangement”.

The MPF, which was started in 2000, consists of dozens of schemes operated by service provider organisations. Members receive a tax deduction for their contributions but in the past year there has been an intensifying lobbying effort to improve the attractiveness of the scheme.

For instance, in a survey of members last year, more than 60 per cent said they would contribute more if employers were willing to match their contributions or if the tax-deductible limits were raised.

Naomi Denning, Hong Kong-based managing director of investment services for Towers Watson Asia Pacific, said the objective of the tool was to encourage a long-term approach by investors, as well as proving them with the information to make appropriate choices.

Research by Towers Watson has shown that the top three drivers of member decisions were the service providers’ “brand”, past performance and fees. Other research has shown that brand and past performance, at least, offer no guide to future performance. This situation is likely to be exacerbated when the employee choice arrangement, which makes for easier switching, comes into force later this year, although there will also be greater competition between service providers.

Sponsored Content

The portal address is: www.mpfexpress.com. The magazine will be available as a PDF on the site as well as in hard copy.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous