Hedge FoFs on the wane with experienced investors

Hedge funds have had a bad rap for a long time, often undeserved. But the global financial crisis coupled with the Madoff scandal has affected their growth. UK-based alternatives research firm Preqin surveyed 50 institutional investors about their investments with hedge funds and hedge funds of funds (FoFs).

The demands of institutional investors following their experiences of the past two years are re-shaping the hedge fund industry as it emerges from the financial crisis, according to a Preqin report.

The report is based on a survey of 50 institutional investors, which included pension funds, endowments, family offices, asset managers and insurance companies, which took place in June.

The survey showed a trend away from hedge FoFs, but this is primarily among those investors with the most experience in the space. There is still good demand for hedge FoFs, especially among newer investors.

“FoFs are still viewed positively by institutional investors, with a significant proportion utilizing multi-manager vehicles as an educational tool to familiarise themselves with the asset class,” the report says.

“(Hedge FoFs) can expect a steady flow of mandates as new investors are constantly committing to the asset class.

Sponsored Content

“However, as the institutional market continues to mature, we can expect an increasing number to allocate capital to single-manager funds.

“As a manager of FoFs it is increasingly important to be aware of which investors are looking to take their first steps into the asset class in order to market your fund to the correct audience.”

The survey shows that while 64 per cent of respondents gained their first exposure to hedge funds via FoFs, only 36 per cent still invest solely through the multi-manager vehicles.

Most of the respondents who moved away from FoFs did so during 2008, when hedge fund manager Bernie Madoff was charged with defrauding clients over a long period, some of whom were well-known hedge FoFs.

But the desire for lower fees and more control over their investments are the main driver of the trend. A total of 60 per cent say lower fees from direct hedge funds and 54 per cent say the need for more “control” are the top reasons for going into direct investments instead of FoFs.

Of those who remain invested in FoFs, 66 per cent say that this is because of the diversification benefits, followed by 40 per cent who say it is because they lack the in-house resources to thoroughly research underlying hedge fund managers.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous