Gunning for diversity, dynamism and due diligence

The new low-return, high-volatility environment requires broadly diversified portfolios, dynamic decision-making and rigorous due diligence, which is beyond the internal capacity of most small funds under $10 billion, warns Russell Investment’s global chief investment officer Peter Gunning.

He says smaller funds must decide if it is cost effective and even possible to internally manage investment portfolios that can successfully adapt to this new fast-changing environment.

“If you are not on this 24/7, in reality, you are going to miss opportunities,” Gunning says. “If you are waiting for the monthly meeting of the investment committee, markets might have been up and down a lot in between and you may have done nothing.”

Gunning believes the current market conditions are here to stay for at least the medium term and if funds are going to achieve their return objectives, they need to take a comprehensive look at their investment processes.

“I would argue if you are probably under $10 billion, it (insourcing investment management) is probably not worth doing. You can do it but you are doing it in a hybrid model,” he says.

Russell manages more than $150 billion for clients that typically outsource their investment decisions to the global asset manager.

Sponsored Content

 

Three-pronged approach to volatility
Managing the current environment requires a threefold response, according to Gunning.

The first is to look to greater diversity of assets, both listed and unlisted. This multi-asset solution should be implemented with what he calls an “open architecture”.

This approach ensures that the full suite of options is available in any one asset class to achieve a return objective, with the investment team not locked into any one manager or proprietary product.

Gunning says that dynamic asset allocation should involve a rebalancing back to the strategic asset allocation when valuations change, altering the weight of the particular asset class in the portfolio.

It is an approach that has been championed by the investment teams of such large funds as the $165-billion Canadian Pension Plan (CPP).

Secondly, funds should look to ensure dynamic decision-making that can adapt to fast-changing market conditions, both within an asset class and across asset classes.

“Volatility isn’t necessarily a bad thing. It just means that the investment process may need to adapt to it,” Gunning says.

“So, it is all about being more dynamic in terms of the asset allocation decisions across that diverse set of building blocks.”

Finally, Gunning says, due diligence has moved well beyond the sphere of manager selection and now demands ongoing oversight of operations to minimise risk.

In a low-return environment, part of this is due diligence to ensure efficient execution across a diversified portfolio so there is not what he calls “implementation leakage” because every basis point is crucial.

‘It is a whole lot of small things, particularly when returns are low, but they all add up,” he says.

 

Equities are not dead
Looking ahead, Gunning says that the fund is cautiously optimistic about equities that “may surprise on the upside”.

“We think that on a relative basis equities are a fairly good place to put your money,” he says.

Gunning has previously warned about the need for investors to actively manage their fixed income portfolios, saying that typical indexes expose investors to the biggest debtors.

In addition, he notes that fixed income investors should look carefully at their sovereign exposure, raising concerns that a bubble is emerging in some segments of the sovereign debt universe.

“There is definitely on the sovereign side a bond bubble developing. When you think about 10-year treasuries at 1.5 per cent and two-year government auctions going off at negative, TIPS – five-year and ten-year – are very low.”

“Interest rates can only go so far, we wouldn’t say that equities will come roaring back, but on a relative basis we are more positively disposed to equities than sovereign bonds. We do think there is a reasonable case to maintain positions in high quality corporates and high yield.”

In its fixed income portfolio, Russell currently has what Gunning describes as a “systematic overweight to credit”.

Regionally, Gunning sees that the US may provide better outcomes than Europe, which will be “difficult at best”, and, predicts a soft landing for China.

“On a relative basis, North America is probably providing the best opportunities, followed by Asia and then Europe, on the equity side.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous