Governance foiled by human folly at NY state fund

The third largest fund in the US, the $122 billion New York state pension fund, has recently been embroiled in a tale of greed, fraud, bribery and corruption, with a number of its alternative investment funds allegedly tainted by the wrong-doing of former employees of the state comptroller’s officer, including its former CIO.

In this week’s “Have Your Say” column we ask you to consider the transparency of the investments in this sector, and have your say on how funds can better monitor their investments and the people that manage them.


An ongoing investigation, already two years old, has seen 123 charges laid against former employees of the New York State Comptroller’s office – the sole trustee of the State Pension Fund – including enterprise corruption, money laundering, securities fraud, grand larceny and bribery.

Hank Morris, former chief political adviser, and David Loglisci, former chief investment officer, have been charged with conspiring to sell access to billions of taxpayer dollars in exchange for millions of dollars in kickbacks.

It is alleged that Morris received more than $30 million in fees for himself and his business partners on investments which he had a role in approving, and that the two of them ran a pay-to-play scheme in which investment firms had to kick back part of their fees to get work with the New York pension fund. The payments allegedly went to Morris, who then distributed the money.

In one of the more outlandish allegations, it is alleged Loglisci steered hundred of millions of dollars worth of investment deals to Morris and to favoured firms, and accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of benefits in the form of sham “investments” for the production by his brother of a low budget movie, “Chooch”.

Sponsored Content

According to the New York Attorney General’s office, more than 20 investment deals were allegedly tainted by the defendants kick-back schemes and fraudulent self-dealing, including:

  • Access/NY European Fund, a captive fund of funds with almost $600 million in capital commitments from the State pension fund, generating over $2.3 million in sham management fees for Morris and his partner. Morris’s role was allegedly concealed from Access.
  • Aldus New York Emerging Fund, a captive fund of funds with $375 million in capital commitments from the State pension fund, generating $262,000 in sham management fees for Morris. Aldus Equity Partners, L.P. is also an outside consultant and fiduciary to the State pension fund on private equity transactions. Morris secured this mandate for Aldus after having blocked Pharos from receiving the mandate when a principal of Pharos Capital Group, LLC, refused to pay Morris or his partner. Morris then caused Aldus to invest in other funds on which Morris also obtained sham placement fees.
  • Five investments involving The Carlyle Group, one of the world’s largest private equity funds, totalling approximately $730 million in capital commitments from the State pension fund. Morris and his partner obtained over $13 million in sham placement fees.
  • GKM/NY Venture Capital Fund, a captive fund of funds with $800 million in capital commitments from the State pension fund. Morris and his partner, a political crony of Hevesi, obtained over $650,000 in sham placement fees.
  • Olympia John Street Fund LP, a hedge fund with $900 million in capital commitments from the State pension fund, generating over $6.6 million in fees for Morris and his partner.
  • Paladin Homeland Security Fund (NY), a $20 million private equity fund, generating $300,000 in sham placement fees for a political crony of Hevesi. That person also received hidden fees of over $500,000 in connection with Pequot Diversified Offshore Fund/Pequot Private Equity Partners Fund IV, which had a combined commitment of $110 million from the State pension fund.
  • Strategic Co-Investment Partners, a co-investment fund with $750 million in capital commitments, the largest capital commitment by the State pension fund at the time. This generated over $1.2 million in sham management fees for Morris’s partner, with Morris as a secret partner.

Have your say and leave your comments below

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous