Global union leader challenges funds to see big picture

As the G20 meeting looms, Sharan Burrow, general secretary of the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), told delegates at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium to stop acting as if fiduciary management existed in a bubble.

“We want pension funds to do well, but they have to stop pretending fiduciary management is in a bubble,” she said.

The session was a discussion forum with Colin Tate, chief executive of Conexus Financial, publisher of Top1000funds.com, where Burrow challenged delegates to widen their view.

She said fiduciary management does not take into consideration human and labour rights or sustainable futures.

“It is not a licence to concentrate on short-term returns,” she said. “The real economy disconnect is extraordinary.”

Commenting on the Occupy Wall Street rallies, she said protests won’t stop until people are put back at the centre of sensible politics.

Sponsored Content

Burrow (pictured), who said 75 per cent of the world’s population does not have a retirement safety net, will present a solution to the G20 this week.

Burrow criticised the G20 for losing its way, saying that the promise to reform the financial sector has failed.

“There are 30 million extra unemployed because of the financial crisis,” she said. “We have the highest unemployment in history right now. Global growth is not enough to provide jobs. We all have a responsibility to do something to drive jobs growth.”

“There is a disconnect between the real economy and the financial economy,” she said.

Burrow said there needs to be global collaboration on the investment in jobs everywhere.

“It may not look the same everywhere, but there has to be global coordination,” she said.

There is $13 trillion in assets under the realm of ITUC via its members, which constitute 175 million workers.

Burrow’s presentation followed Towers Watson’s head of portfolio advisory for the Asia Pacific, Peter Ryan-Kane, who challenged delegates to extend the context of their viewpoint.

“There can’t be asset allocation without a social policy,” he said.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Tennessee finally enters private equity game

The $28 billion Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System is a late entrant into private equity with its debut $25 million allocation to the Draper Fisher Jurvetson Fund X, occurring at the same time the fund has cut its allocation to short term assets by 5 per cent. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

UN fund increases equities exposure

The $37 billion United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund increased its allocation to equities by 4 per cent in the past quarter, at the expense of real estate and bonds, and is now overweight the asset class, as it continues to support active management. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS measures liqudity levels

  About half of the $201 billion in assets managed by CalPERS is available to liquidate within 90 days according to a new total fund liquidity assessment to be presented to the investment committee as part of the quarterly risk management update, which also shows the fund to have a total leverage of 19 per

Mapping the risks of bigger government

Bigger appetites for absolute return strategies, new attitudes to risk and governance, and the onset of major regulation – these were the forces for change identified in Watson Wyatt’s 2008 study, Defining Moments. But the social fallout from the financial crisis has sparked another phenomenon that could heavily impact institutional investors, according to Tim Hodgson

LACERS alters allocations to hedge against inflation

The $9.3 billion Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System will tilt its asset allocation to hedge against inflation and will discuss altering its investment policy to explicitly address inflation at each annual asset allocation review. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Massachusetts special commission recommends system changes

A recently completed report by a special commission into the appropriateness of the Massachusetts retirement system contemplated the defined benefit versus defined contribution benefit design, concluding that the existing defined benefit structure was optimal, in part because it put the portfolio management in the hands of professionals. The report entitled, The Special Commission to Study

Previous