Global equities lose ground to alternatives

Allocations to alternatives worldwide are expected to increase by more than 5 per cent at the expense of global equities in the next two years, according to Russell Investments 2010 global survey on alternative investing.

Infrastructure allocations are expected to increase most meaningfully relative to the other asset classes, albeit from a very low base, the also survey found.

“Infrastructure and commodities are becoming more important to institutions around the globe. They are expected to represent an important share of overall growth in allocations to alternatives through 2012, though from a very low base,” the report said.

Private equity allocations are expected to increase, especially in North America, based on a combination of valuation improvements and new commitments.

The increase in allocation to alternatives will come at the expense of global equities because the crisis highlighted the systematic risk of global equities, the survey found.

Sponsored Content

“The higher correlations between global equity sectors, styles and regions since 2008 have increased interest in alternative strategies that can help to diversify portfolios and reduce equity beta exposure, the survey said.

Reducing volatility was the main motivation for increasing allocations, according to the survey of 119 institutional investors managing a total of $1.3 trillion in assets, followed by improving returns and better risk-adjusted performance.

The survey was conducted by Russell in conjunction with McKinsey & Company.

Alternative types as a percentage of total portfolio assets

Type  2009  expected by 2012

Private equity  3.1%  4.9%

Hedge funds  4.2%  5.7%

Real estate 4.1%  6.6%

Infrastructure  0.3% 1.4%

Commodities 0.7%  1.1%

Totals  12.4%*  19.7%

*Note: the 12.4 per cent total above is the sum of allocations to each type, and it is drawn from a different survey question than the 14 per cent ‘total allocation’. The 1.6% difference may be to un-categorised alternative allocations (not assigned to a specific type).

Source: Russell Investments

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous