Global equities lose ground to alternatives

Allocations to alternatives worldwide are expected to increase by more than 5 per cent at the expense of global equities in the next two years, according to Russell Investments 2010 global survey on alternative investing.

Infrastructure allocations are expected to increase most meaningfully relative to the other asset classes, albeit from a very low base, the also survey found.

“Infrastructure and commodities are becoming more important to institutions around the globe. They are expected to represent an important share of overall growth in allocations to alternatives through 2012, though from a very low base,” the report said.

Private equity allocations are expected to increase, especially in North America, based on a combination of valuation improvements and new commitments.

The increase in allocation to alternatives will come at the expense of global equities because the crisis highlighted the systematic risk of global equities, the survey found.

Sponsored Content

“The higher correlations between global equity sectors, styles and regions since 2008 have increased interest in alternative strategies that can help to diversify portfolios and reduce equity beta exposure, the survey said.

Reducing volatility was the main motivation for increasing allocations, according to the survey of 119 institutional investors managing a total of $1.3 trillion in assets, followed by improving returns and better risk-adjusted performance.

The survey was conducted by Russell in conjunction with McKinsey & Company.

Alternative types as a percentage of total portfolio assets

Type  2009  expected by 2012

Private equity  3.1%  4.9%

Hedge funds  4.2%  5.7%

Real estate 4.1%  6.6%

Infrastructure  0.3% 1.4%

Commodities 0.7%  1.1%

Totals  12.4%*  19.7%

*Note: the 12.4 per cent total above is the sum of allocations to each type, and it is drawn from a different survey question than the 14 per cent ‘total allocation’. The 1.6% difference may be to un-categorised alternative allocations (not assigned to a specific type).

Source: Russell Investments

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous