Funds flow to bonds. Why?

The largest bond manager in the world, PIMCO, is cleaning up. Figures from researcher and data provider eVestment Alliance show that institutional investors put more than twice the amount of money into US fixed-income funds in the past three months than any other asset class.

Notwithstanding the rhetoric of pension funds around the world that they are rebalancing to growth assets, particularly into emerging markets equities, the evidence is they continue to increase their fixed-interest exposures despite historically low yields.

The eVestment report, drawn from pension fund flows across 15 asset classes in major markets, shows that total fund flows into US fixed income was $38 billion in the latest quarter to September. This compared to about $17 billion going into emerging markets equities and another $14 billion into global fixed interest.

US-based global fixed-interest specialist PIMCO, occupied four of the top five positions for funds flows to individual manager funds or strategies. The only other fund in the top five, at number two, was a passive US large-cap equity product from BlackRock.

The two least attractive asset classes for institutional investors during the period were EAFE (Europe Australia and Far East) equities, with minus $20 billion, and all US equities, with minus $26 billion.

While emerging markets enjoyed positive flows, global equities in general did not. The figures show a negative $7 billion flow to global equities and other small negative flows to UK, Japanese and Australian equities. Asia Pacific equities had a positive flow of $5 billion.

Sponsored Content

The popular individual fund for investors’ new money in the period was PIMCO’s ‘Core Plus: Total Return Full Authority’ fund. Short-term bond and cash funds generally suffered net outflows.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous