Full transparency of big hedge fund positions from now on: AIMA

The peak body for the global hedge fund industry, the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) has backed a proposal mandating the full transparency and disclosure of ‘stematically significant’ positions and risk exposures held by hedge funds to their national regulators.

The principle is one of many positions announced in a new AIMA policy platform, formulated while representing the global hedge fund industry in international discussions about the future regulatory framework for hedge funds.

The talks were tasked by the G20 and are being convened by organisations such as International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) and the Financial Stability Forum.

The new policies put forward by AIMA were:

1) Regular reporting and better transparency of systematically significant positions held by large hedge funds to their national regulators;

2) An aggregated short-selling disclosure regime to national regulators;

Sponsored Content

3) Support for new policies to reduce settlement failure (encompassing naked short-selling);

4) Support for a “global manager-authorisation and supervision template” based on the UK’s Financial Services Authority; and

5) Call for unified global standards for the industry based on the convergence of work by AIMA, IOSCO, the Hedge Fund Standards Board, the US President’s Working Group on Financial Markets and the Managed Funds Association.

In a statement, Andrew Baker, the chief executive of AIMA based in London, said the peak body supported the disclosure measures in order to improve unfavourable perceptions of hedge funds.

“We want to dispel the misconception that the hedge fund industry is opaque and uncooperative,” Baker said.

AIMA’s 1,200 members, which include hedge funds, prime brokers and fund administrators, manage more than 75 per cent of hedge fund assets globally.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous