France’s FFR halves equities, weights bonds

Equities allocations have been slashed as a result of government changes to the liabilities of the Fonds de Reserve pour les Retraites (FFR) which prompted changes to the fund’s investment policy.

The new portfolio, approved in December 2010, more than halved the allocation to equities from 45 per cent to 21 per cent. It substantially increased allocations to bonds from 45 per cent to 73.9 per cent while commodities and real estate were both decreased from 5 per cent to 3.5 per cent and 1.8 per cent respectively.

This new portfolio was adopted in the belief that it would satisfy FRR’s liabilities which now entail 14 annual payments of €2.1 billion ($2.9 billion) to the Caisee d’Amotissement de la Dette Sociale (national social debt amortisation fund – CADES).

The fund – which totalled $51.6 billion at the end of last year – was created to meet the challenges of funding the mandatory retirement PAYGO plans.

As well as meeting the FRR’s liabilities, the changes to the strategic allocation are expected to provide an expected annualised return of 6 per cent, a decrease from the expected 6.3 per cent outlined in the 2009 policy.

It will be seen this year if the FRR is successful in its purpose of propping the French pension system up, with its annual payments to CADES commencing. The payments must be made each year by October until 2018, as outlined by a government set timetable, and will help CADES finance the deficits of the bodies which run the basic old age pension.

Sponsored Content

The breakdown of the new portfolio is as follows:

–          Commodities: 3.5 per cent

–          Real estate: 1.8 per cent

–          Emerging countries debt: 5.3 per cent

–          High yield debt: 3.5 per cent

–          Equities (including private equity): 21.0 per cent

–          Corporate bonds (Inv. Grade): 16.3 per cent

–          OECD Sovereign Bonds: 16.3 per cent

–          Cashflow-matched French Treasury Bonds (OAT): 32.5 per cent

One response to “France’s FFR halves equities, weights bonds”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous