Feeling the force of falling endowments

A number of Ivy League universities – including Yale, Cornell and the University of Pennsylvania (Penn) – are directly feeling the affects of the negative performance of their endowment funds, and are being forced to cut operating budgets for the 2009/10 financial year.

Yale University’s president, Richard Levin, announced further budgetary cuts last week, a direct result of a fall in the endowment’s asset value.

Income from the Yale endowment accounts for 44 per cent of the university’s annual expense base of US$2.7 billion, and the current fall of 25 per cent in the endowment’s value is contributing to a shortfall of $100 million in the 2009/10 fiscal year.

Among cuts that Levin announced were: slashing capital spending in the form of postponing any new building or renovation projects; and a reduction in university staff salaries of 7.5 per cent for the fiscal year (previously budgeted at 5 per cent).

Unusually, Levin announced interim results for the endowment in December last year, and at that time estimated the endowment’s value at $17 billion, a decline of 25 per cent since June 2008. This is the value being used for budget purposes.

Sponsored Content

“It is not our custom to announce the mid-year status of our endowment portfolio, but these unusual circumstances call for a departure from custom,” he said in a statement to faculty and staff.

“Thanks to the outstanding work of [chief investment officer] David Swensen and his colleagues in the investment office, our endowment has declined significantly less than market indices.”

However he went on to say that the 25 per cent decline experienced has a very significant impact on operations.

In the university press, Swensen has defended the endowment’s investment strategy.

Meanwhile, Cornell University has also announced cost cutting in the form of staff reductions in the next financial year, and Penn, whose endowment has fallen by 19.4 per cent, will increase its term bill by 3.8 per cent, raising the cost of attendance to $50,000. Penn’s endowment contributes only 9 per cent to operating expenses.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous