Farmland comes of age for pension funds

As a relatively new and untapped asset class, farmland remains mysterious to some institutional investors. Greg Bright spoke to Charmion McBride, chief operating officer of Insight Investment, an affiliate manager of BNY Mellon Asset Management, about the benefits of the asset class which include uncorrelated returns and SRI considerations.

There are lots of ironies in pension funds management, with its fondness for categorisation. One is that what is arguably the oldest form of investment – farmland – which followed shortly after the development of the family cave, is considered an alternative asset.

Yet the world still needs farmland, probably more than ever, and now with all the financial packaging that pension funds and other institutional investors demand, there is a growing array of products to capitalise on this very old type of investment.

The beauty of investing in farmland, apart from the obvious connection with the world’s demand for food, is that it represents “real” assets, rather than financial ones, and its correlations with other parts of a portfolio are low.

Charmion McBride, chief operating officer, global farmland at Insight Investment, the big UK-based affiliate manager of BNY Mellon Asset Management says there are three main components to the investment return from farmland: commodity prices; land value appreciation; and active alpha, which includes productivity enhancements.

Sponsored Content

Putting aside the fundamentals, such as about 60 million extra mouths to feed per year in the world at current growth rates, farmland has several attractive characteristics for pension funds.

Clearly, it is a long-term investment, with a 10-year horizon not uncommon. It is a hedge against inflation. And, to the extent that the investment can be benchmarked, it is lowly correlated with equities and bond markets.

London-based McBride says that pension funds she has spoken to who are looking to fit farmland into their portfolio may consider it as either a real estate play, private equity or income-producing investment.

The West Midlands Pension Fund of the UK, tends to see the Insight investment in terms of its sustainability risk budget. The fund has a strong SRI focus.

With Insight’s offering, which is made available via private placement, McBride says that SRI considerations are incorporated both at time of purchase of the asset – farm property or agriculture-related investment – and in ongoing farm management. The manager follows the process developed by the European Initiative for Sustainable Development in Agriculture which recommends a holistic approach to try to balance potentially conflicting issues of food production, profitability, safety, energy efficiency, animal welfare, social responsibility and environmental care.

An interesting aspect of the return dynamics for farmland is that land values tend to hold up, and go up, despite the fluctuations in commodity prices.

From Insight’s perspective, it is not unreasonable for investors to expect a total net return target of 15 per cent a year, unlevered, with income distributions of up to six times a year after about three years.

Diversification comes from geographical spread and commodity range. The manager looks to identify countries with a comparative advantage and farming “partners” which also show an outperformance track record.

The big underlying driver of farmland returns is, of course, the rising demand for food. The production of biofuels will also kick in over the next few years, but the expected growth in the world’s population, coupled with rising living standards in emerging countries, will place steadily increasing pressure on demand.

While continued productivity improvements will take some of the pressure off supply, as they say about land: they are not making any more of it.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous