Endowments need to think short term to counteract GFC

Endowments and foundations need to adapt their investment policies to incorporate more short-term alterations as a way to meet liquidity challenges presented by the global financial crisis, according to new research by Russell Investments.

Heather Myers, director of endowment and foundation strategy at Russell Investments, said traditional sources of liquidity have dried up in the past year, and endowments should review how they will meet their spending needs.

The liquidity pressure has come in many forms, including investment income and decreasing charitable contributions, and will force fiduciaries of endowments to approach their investments with a more short-term outlook, something they do not traditionally do.

“Non-profit entities need to carefully assess their spending policies and understand the true need for liquidity as well as the true liquidity of their portfolio,” Myers said.

“On the investment front, now may be a time for tactical manoeuvring where interim, short to medium term restrictions are not in play. Once we are in a more stable environment, endowments and foundations can consider reverting back to established strategic allocations.”

The report says endowments and foundations are challenged by the fact that the largest component of additions to their investment pools in appreciation and investment income have weakened.

Sponsored Content

In addition, charitable contributions have experienced a steep downturn, and even short-term bond funds where operating cash is often invested have been hit hard and in some cases frozen.

“The industry is facing unprecedented times, and with traditional sources of liquidity less available, fiduciaries of non-profit portfolios have to review how they’ll meet their spending needs,” Myers said.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous