Dutch funds reduce risk as recovery plans kick in

Dutch pension funds have been forced to rejig their asset allocations, reducing risk in an attempt to meet stringent statutory funding requirements enforced by the Dutch regulator, De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB).

Stichting Shell Pensioenfonds has adjusted its strategic asset allocation as part of a recovery plan submitted recently to DNB, reducing its allocation to listed equities and increasing its allocation to fixed income and alternatives.

Listed equities have decreased from 55 to 45 per cent, fixed income securities have increased from 30 to 35 per cent, and alternative investments have grown from 15 to 20 per cent, the fund said.

In addition, Shell has shifted its regional distribution of equities, allocating 5 percentage points more to European equities at the expense of emerging market equities.

The €173 billion ABP also recently adapted its investment portfolio in light of the regulator’s requirement for funds to return their funding ratio to the minimum statutory level of 105 per cent.

ABP announced a raft of measures as part of its own recovery plan, one of which involved reducing the investment risk in the overall portfolio to improve the fund’s financial position. At the end of 2008, ABP’s funding ratio was 90 per cent.

Sponsored Content

“The risk profile of the investment portfolio has been adjusted slightly in the investment plan for 2009 and the following years, whereby the risk of a fall in the coverage ratio is reduced,” the fund said.

ABP did not expand on how the reduction in risk had been achieved, or which asset classes were affected by the move.

According to DNB, about 350 out of the 650 Dutch pension funds were required to submit recovery plans before April 1, 2009.

“It is in the interest of pension fund members that clarity is soon provided about their pension funds’ positions and the measures (potentially) to be taken,” DNB said in a statement.

“Pension funds themselves play a crucial role in minimising unnecessary delays and maximising the transparency of the information sought.”

The Shell pension fund board had already temporarily adjusted the fund’s asset allocation in October 2008 due to market volatility, reducing listed equities exposure to 30 per cent and increasing the allocations to fixed income and alternatives to 50 and 20 per cent respectively.

Shell said the decision as to when and how to move from the temporary to the new strategic asset allocation remains under review by the board.

Shell’s funding ratio is currently about 80 per cent. The recovery plan rules out conditional indexation in 2009, and includes an increase in employer contributions from 5 per cent to 23.6 per cent from January 1, 2009 and additional funding based on the existing agreements between the pension fund and the Shell member companies.

ABP has opted for a period of five years within which to restore its coverage ratio to 105 per cent.

Its recovery plan includes a temporary increase in the premium for old-age and surviving dependants’ pensions, to be paid jointly by employers and employees but does not include any reductions in pension entitlements.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous