Defined benefit still dominates largest funds

Defined benefit funds still dominate the structure of the largest 300 pension funds globally, and this troop of large funds now make up almost half of all pension assets around the world.

The total assets of the world’s largest 300 pension funds grew by 11 per cent in 2010 to a total of $12.5 trillion, an all-time high, according to this year’s P&I/Towers Watson global 300 ranking.

Defined benefit funds still account for 70 per cent of assets, and grew by 8 per cent last year. Defined contribution funds grew by 11 per cent.

There is a geographical shift underway in the dominance of pension assets, and while the US still has the largest share of pension assets, with 34 per cent, this has declined from 45 per cent only five years ago.

Europe has had the highest five-year growth rate of 11 per cent.

An analysis of the annualised growth rates of the countries that make up the top 20 shows funds in China recorded a massive 38.9 per cent growth rate. The next largest was Norway with 18.5 per cent.

Sponsored Content

There was little shift in the rankings of the largest funds, with the Government Pension Investment Fund of Japan still the largest fund – at $1.4 trillion it is nearly three times the next largest – a position it has held for the past eight years.

Notable movements in the rankings were the Canada Pension Plan which moved from 12th to 8th; the GEPF of South Africa which moved from 18th to 15th; and the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan which moved in to the top 20 from 22nd (it replaced the General Motors).

According to global head of investment at Towers Watson, Carl Hess, the asset allocation of these large funds has shifted to a more conservative status over the past five years. The top 20 funds, on average, now have an equal amount in equities and bonds (about 40 per cent in each) with the remainder in alternatives and cash, he says.

 

P&I/Towers Watson 300 ranking ($US millions)

Rank Fund Total Assets
1 Government Pension Investment Fund, Japan $1,432,122
2 Government Pension Fund Global, Norway $550,858
3 ABP, Netherlands $318,807
4 National Pension Fund, Korea $289,418
5 Federal Retirement Thrift Savings Plan, US $264,013
6 CalPERS, US $214,387
7 Local Government Officials, Japan $189,633
8 Canada Pension Plan, Canada $149,142
9 Employees Provident Fund, Malaysia $145, 570
10 Central Provident Fund, Singapore $144,844
11 CalSTRS, US $138,888
12 New York State Common, US $133,023
13 PFZW, Netherlands $133,002
14 National Social Security, China $129,789
15 GEPF, South Africa $128,232
16 Pension Fund Association, Japan $124, 987
17 ATP, Denmark $123, 757
18 Florida State Board, US $123,373
19 New York City Retirement, US $115,024
20 Ontario Teachers, Canada $108,148

 

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

‘Coherence’ key for defined contribution

As the world moves to defined contribution structures, many questions remain about its robustness, not the least of which is how defined contribution funds deliver adequacy.

Program related investment highs + lows

Program related investment is a growing passion for wealthy individuals behind foundations and endowments, but it is a growing source of concern for their chief investment officers.

Slow death for Japan’s pension funds

Pensions expert, Hidekazu Ishida, talks about the state of corporate pension funds in Japan – from where they’ve been to where they’re going – and discusses some popular investment strategies.

A look into the future of investing

The future of investing is in the creation of new wealth, not recycling claims on old wealth, according to the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on the Future of Investing.

Investment theory: good ‘in theory’

Investors should not rely on investment theory because the complex and connected risks in the real world cannot fully be accounted for, says Tim Unger, of Willis Towers Watson.

CALPERS’ chief navigates ‘perfect storm’

Outgoing CaIPERS’ CEO, Anne Stausboll, talks to Amanda White in an exclusive interview, about her passionate views on sustainability, simplifying the portfolio, and where improvements are needed.

Previous