DB beats DC in unequal race

The average corporate defined-benefit plan in the US has outperformed the Callan DC index by 1.61 per cent since 2006, although this is partly due to a difference in fee reporting.

Since the index’s inception five years ago, the index has reported annualised returns of 3.14 per cent, while the average corporate defined benefit plan has reported 4.75 per cent.

Corporate defined-benefit funds report returns gross of fees while the returns of the Callan DC index are net of fees.

The Callan DC index, which is an equally weighted index tracking the cash flows and performance of more than 70 DC plans and $80 billion in assets, shows that assets in the index have grown 6.34 per cent since inception, divided equally between positive performance and net inflows from plan sponsors and participant contributions.

Flow analysis shows that target date funds and domestic fixed income were the biggest beneficiaries for the year to the end of December 2010, while domestic large-cap equity, international equity and stable value all experienced outflows for the year.

The share of equity funds in the index grew in the year, from 62.5 to 64.9 per cent, but below the index’s all-time high of 70.5 per cent at the end of 2006.

Sponsored Content

Callan DC Index asset allocation as at December 31, 2010

Target date funds 10.5%
Brokerage window 1.5%
Company stock 6.9%
Domestic fixed income 9.3%
Domestic large cap 24.1%
Domestic small/mid cap 10.6%
Domestic/global balanced 12.2%
Emerging markets equity 0.4%
International/global equity 7.7%
Money market 3.1%
Stable value 12.2%
Other 1.5%

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Experts mull strategies in slow growth climate

Speaking at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Oxford University’s Rhodes House Fiona Trafford-Walker, director of consulting at Frontier Advisors argues that Australian investors are operating in a changed environment and need to “get used to slower economic growth.” Speaking as part of an expert panel on how the continued environment of slow growth and low

Macro diversification: How do investors diversify risk?

“Geopolitics does matter and how to navigate geopolitical events on a portfolio is challenging,” argues Tom Clarke, partner and portfolio manager at William Blair speaking at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Rhodes House, Oxford University. In a session dedicated to macro strategies for investors to best navigate today’s complex investment universe and diversify risk, Clarke argues that “hiding” from

Oxford Professor urges urgent European reform

The University of Oxford’s distinguished Professor of Economics David Vines predicted the ongoing crisis in Europe will turn into a “train wreck with implications for investors” unless governments undertake significant reforms. He urges for large write downs of the sovereign debt of southern European countries, a loosening of austerity in those countries and a significant

Indexing pressure improves active management

A new study of active and indexed-based mutual funds shows the impact of different countries’ regulatory and financial market environments. The study finds that the average alpha generated by active management is higher in countries with more explicit indexing and lower in countries with more closet indexing. The evidence suggests that explicit indexing improves competition in the mutual fund

Investors need to revamp portfolio construction

Investors should re-consider their investment processes in order to achieve the needed “step-change in efficient portfolio construction” in a low return environment, the chief executive of the A$109 billion ($83 billion) Future Fund, David Neal, says. “It is the investment process that turns the universe of opportunities into a portfolio, and right now that process

Investors need to rethink operating model

A neat little story of investment flows, asset allocation changes, and relationship and service demands is emerging from the third annual Top1000funds.com/Casey Quirk Global Fiduciary CIO Survey. If you’re a CIO of an asset owner what that means is more control but also more responsibilities and the demands of more internal resources. For managers it

Previous