DB beats DC in unequal race

The average corporate defined-benefit plan in the US has outperformed the Callan DC index by 1.61 per cent since 2006, although this is partly due to a difference in fee reporting.

Since the index’s inception five years ago, the index has reported annualised returns of 3.14 per cent, while the average corporate defined benefit plan has reported 4.75 per cent.

Corporate defined-benefit funds report returns gross of fees while the returns of the Callan DC index are net of fees.

The Callan DC index, which is an equally weighted index tracking the cash flows and performance of more than 70 DC plans and $80 billion in assets, shows that assets in the index have grown 6.34 per cent since inception, divided equally between positive performance and net inflows from plan sponsors and participant contributions.

Flow analysis shows that target date funds and domestic fixed income were the biggest beneficiaries for the year to the end of December 2010, while domestic large-cap equity, international equity and stable value all experienced outflows for the year.

The share of equity funds in the index grew in the year, from 62.5 to 64.9 per cent, but below the index’s all-time high of 70.5 per cent at the end of 2006.

Sponsored Content

Callan DC Index asset allocation as at December 31, 2010

Target date funds 10.5%
Brokerage window 1.5%
Company stock 6.9%
Domestic fixed income 9.3%
Domestic large cap 24.1%
Domestic small/mid cap 10.6%
Domestic/global balanced 12.2%
Emerging markets equity 0.4%
International/global equity 7.7%
Money market 3.1%
Stable value 12.2%
Other 1.5%

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

US instos swing back to equities

The Conference Board’s 2010 Institutional Investment Report: Trends in Asset Allocation and Portfolio Composition measures the asset growth and portfolio composition of institutional investors operating in the US.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Blue-eared pigs challenge China’s leaders

Economists hate price and wages controls. They distort the natural forces of markets and usually result in pent-up demand and/or supply which will be unleashed at a later stage as well as a range of unexpected distortions. Investors, too, should hate them. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Russell Axioma launches factor-based indexes

Institutional investors’ increasing use of factor-based models to understand their portfolio risk exposures is the conduit for Russell Investments’ collaboration with Axioma to launch a series of factor-based indexes to rival MSCI/Barra, according to Rolf Agather, managing director of research and innovation at Russell. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Diversification is not enough for managing risk

Diversification alone is not enough to manage downside risk, rather academic research in dynamic portfolio theory suggests the three complementary techniques of diversification, hedging, and insurance can be used together to design customised investment solutions, that ultimately separate assets into performance seeking portfolios and liability hedging portfolios, according to EDHEC’s Felix Goltz and Stoyan Stoyanov.

CalPERS’ redesign creates CFO role

CalPERS will introduce a new leadership organisation design next year, which includes for the first time a dedicated chief financial officer function coordinating all corporate finance functions including cash flow. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Why politics and pension fund management don’t mix

Thomas P DiNapoli was given a little scare in the recent US mid-term elections but, in the end, was returned fairly comfortably to his position of New York State Comptroller and sole trustee of the New York State pension fund. What happens next, though, may be more interesting. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous