CPPIB ends year on a high

Capitalising on opportunities arising from the financial crisis, including savvy private equity, real estate, infrastructure and private debt deals, marked a successful fiscal year for the Canadian Pension Plan Investment Board which recorded one of its highest ever annual returns.

For the fiscal year ending March 31, 2010 the fund returned 14.9 per cent and its asset are now at a pre-crisis level.

David Denison, president and chief executive of CPPIB, said the fund’s long-time horizon, distinct investment approach, available capital and specialised investment expertise allowed it to make significant investments last year that were beyond the reach of many investors.

“We have the benefit of being able to look beyond short-term market cycles, and to deal with volatility better than the majority of market participants,” Denison said. “Unlike many other investors, we did not suffer from capital or liquidity constraints last year. In fact, our experienced investment teams completed a number of significant transactions during the year.”

These included the acquisition of Macquarie Communications Infrastructure Group, as well as partnerships with other investors to acquire IMS Health and Skype.

Sponsored Content

About 25 per cent of the total portfolio is made up of private assets such as real estate, private equity, infrastructure and private debt. While these investments are expected to generate strong returns over the long term, it also contributed to the annual total portfolio return coming in 5.87 per cent below that of the reference portfolio.

“Private investment returns are expected to play out over the long-term and cannot be captured within just a 12-month snapshot. For example, we believe there is considerable value embedded in our real estate and infrastructure investments that will be realised over time,” Denison added.

CPPIB’s five-year annualised return is 4 per cent, and its 10-year annualised return is 5.5 per cent.

The CPPIB has a unique investment approach, whereby it divides each investment into its underlying debt and equity attributes.

For example where real estate may be 6 per cent of the total portfolio, the underlying economic characteristics may be 4 per cent equity and 2 per cent debt.

Taking this further, a core non-Canadian real estate investment is characterised as comparable to 40 per cent global developed market equity, 50 per cent hedged foreign sovereign bonds and 10 per cent Canadian real return bonds. If it is mortgaged then the percentage of bonds is reduced and the equity component is increased.

This provides a “look through” of all public and private assets into the fundamental underlying economic exposures across: equity markets volatility; movements in government bond yields; geographic and industry sectors; and currency exchange rates.

For the year ending March 31, the CPPIB’s portfolio was made up of 43 per cent in Canadian assets, and 57 per cent foreign assets.

Equities represented 55.7 per cent of the portfolio, with 43.2 per cent allocated to public equities and 12.5 per cent private equities.

Fixed income which included bonds, other debt, money market securities and debt financing liabilities represented 30.8 per cent or $39.3 billion.

Inflation-sensitive assets represented 13.5 per cent and of those assets, 5.5 per cent were real estate, 4.6 per cent was infrastructure, and 3.4 per cent was inflation-linked bonds.

CPPIB also added 76 new employees in the past year, 34 in the investment teams and the remainder largely in information technology, investment finance and operations. At year end, had 566 employees: 534 in our Toronto office, 21 in London

 

CPPIB actual asset allocation

Asset class 2010 2009

Equities

Canadian equities 14.5  14.7

Foreign developed markets  36.2  38.3

Emerging markets  5.0  4.4

 

Fixed income

Bonds 28.8 26.9

Other debt  2.8  1.7

Money market securities  0.2 (0.7)

Debt financing liabilities  (1.0)

 

Inflation-sensitive assets

Real estate  5.5  6.5

Infrastructure  4.6  4.3

Inflation-linked bonds  3.4  3.9

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Ugo Bassi focuses on transparency at ICGN

For many people their most memorable in situ news moment is when man landed on the moon or when John Lennon, Princess Diana or Michael Jackson died. But most Italians will remember where they were when Pope Benedict XVI resigned. A country with record unemployment, no head of state and no head of the church

Montagnon defines investor engagement

There is scope for European legislation directing asset owners who issue mandates to service providers in Europe to say that they have “thought through” what they want their asset managers to engage with companies on, ICGN conference delegates heard. Peter Montagnon, senior investment adviser of corporate governance at the UK Financial Reporting Council, says there

Code of conduct for proxy voting industry

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has developed a set of high level principles with the aim of encouraging the proxy voting industry to develop its own code of conduct. Speaking at the ICGN conference in Milan, the head of the investment and reporting division at ESMA, Laurent Degabriel, said it will set a

Breakfast with AQR’s Cliff Asness

Having a breakfast meeting with Cliff Asness is a wake-up call. He will let you know if you’re late – something he holds in very little regard. He admits he has to constantly remind himself that just because he’s 20 minutes early to everything that others are not automatically then 20 minutes late. Asness is

Tackling sustainability in emerging markets

Emerging market investing and sustainable investing easily rank as two of the most substantiated of the many investment trends of the past decade. However, the two styles of investing are far from natural bedfellows. Christian Ragnartz, as chief investment officer of the $17-billion-plus Swedish pension fund AP7 – which has 13 per cent of its

Ownership: a forgotten art?

While the responsible investment field has come a long way, the majority of investors are still treating it as an overlay, rather than truly integrating it into investment decision-making. This is not an ideal situation for the investment industry, not to mention society at large, but it presents an opportunity for those that do integrate

Previous