Corporate US plans expect too much

US corporate defined-benefit plans are still severely underfunded, with an artificially high return expectation contributing to the situation, according to a report of the funding status of 308 US corporate defined benefit plans by Wilshire Consulting.

While the funding status of the funds has increased in the past year, from 80.2 to 83.4 per cent, more than 90 of the corporate pension plans remain underfunded.

The slight improvement was due to a vast improvement in pension fund performance, with the median 2009 investment return of 16.2 per cent representing a stark rebound from the -27.4 per cent median return of 2008.

The survey measured the funding status, and investment profile, of 308 companies in the S&P500 index that maintain defined benefit plans. In the year the combined assets increased from $883 billion to $992.9 billion, while the liabilities increased from $1,101.5 billion to $1,191.2 billion.

Although the median expected return on plan assets’ assumptions has fallen during the past nine years, from 9.5 per cent in 2000 to 8 per cent in 2009, the report quotes that many pension accounting critics believe this assumption is still too high.

Sponsored Content

Wilshire Consulting’s long-term forecast for the return on corporate pension plans is will below this, at about 6.4 per cent, based on the average asset allocation of the corporate pension plans.

The average asset allocation of these plans was: 54.1 per cent in total equities; 34 per cent in total fixed income; 1.7 per cent in real estate; 1.4 per cent in private equity; 0.8 per cent in hedge funds; and 8 per cent in other including cash.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous