Consultant warns of PPIP risks

The Pension Consulting Alliance is warning clients to exercise caution in investing in the Public-Private Investment Program, advising that other opportunistic fixed income investments offer a better risk/return profile.


In a letter to clients, the US consulting firm said lack of investment liquidity was a key concern, with investors facing a long lock-up period of eight years while still being subject to potential capital calls.

In addition they were complex structured securities requiring high levels of scrutiny, contained leverage and some uncertainty associated with price discovery, and were in a highly volatile and illiquid market.

The consultant also warned there could be potential for high investment management fees and misalignment of interest.

Under the program the government will make $30 billion available in one-to-one financing available to the nine managers to buy troubled securities from financial institutions.

The selected managers have up to three months to raise at least $500 million from private investors, which PCA said was a tight deadline in which to evaluate PPIP investments.

Sponsored Content

PCA’s analysis of the underlying assets, which are legacy senior residential mortgage-backed securities and senior commercial mortgage-backed securities which have fallen dramatically in price during the economic downturn, shows they will continue to exhibit significant credit and default risks.

While there are some benefits to the PPIP mortgage securities program, including potentially large returns and no mark-to-market accounting, PCA also said manager selection issues were heightened.

Only a small number of funds managers have been selected, which greatly limits the breadth of manager selection usually exercised, PCA said.

The managers participating in the initial round of the program are:

  • AllianceBernstein, LP and
    its sub-advisors Greenfield Partners, LLC and Rialto Capital Management, LLC;
  • Angelo, Gordon & Co.,
    L.P. and GE Capital Real Estate;
  • BlackRock, Inc.;
  • Invesco Ltd.;
  • Marathon Asset Management, L.P.;
  • Oaktree Capital Management,
    L.P.;
  • RLJ Western Asset
    Management, LP.;
  • The TCW Group, Inc.; and
  • Wellington Management
    Company, LLP.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous