Co-investment opportunities come to the fore

The distress in the financial markets is offering Australian superannuation funds good opportunities to achieve a higher internal rate of return (IRR) on quality assets purchased directly.

Sam Magee, commercial director at Australian investment manager Industry Funds Management (IFM), told the Conference of Major Superannuation Funds (CMSF) held in Australia this week, that there are now more opportunities to buy quality assets at a better price.

“With more distressed sellers, more sellers and less buyers, you can get better IRR out of the market,” Magee said.

Magee said direct investment was about more than just paying the most cash to win the asset, and it was critical to know when to walk away from a deal.

“There is no shame in walking away from the wrong deal,” he said. “The alternative could be losing potentially millions if the asset doesn’t stack up to the valuation.”

Sponsored Content

Co-investment with other institutional investors can help to balance the portfolio and provide access to quality deals, Magee said.

However super funds must “vet potential co-investment partners, to ensure their interests are aligned with the other investors entering the consortium.

Potentially dangerous co-investors include conflicted investors, who are not necessarily driven by the return on equity, those who are politically sensitive, and “goughing” co-investors – who are heavily focused on fees.

Preferred co-investors are those that do not charge upfront or ongoing fees; do not have conflicts of interest; and that share an aligned view about getting the deal done.

Selecting the right advisers on the deal is just as important as choosing the right co-investors, and once the deal is done, the asset must be reviewed regularly, Magee said.

IFM has invested A$1.5 billion purchasing interests in 45 assets around the world.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous