Capital markets look strong: panel

The fundamentals of global capital markets have never been stronger, and the world is “OK”, a panel of global funds management executives told delegates at the Milken Institute Global Conference.

Michael Corbat, chief executive of Citigroup, which has 200 million customers in 160 countries, said the drivers of growth in the US – housing and jobs – were both looking good, and the full benefit of its tax reforms was still to come.

“The world is OK,” Corbat said. “We are 106 months into this recovery and it wasn’t until the second half of 2016 that we started to match or exceed the expectations of what growth looks and feels like; 2017 was the first full year of that.”

JP Morgan Asset Management chief executive Mary Callahan Erdoes, who oversees $2.8 trillion in assets, said there were many things to be concerned about, but the longevity of the recovery was not one of them.

“We are at a 44-year low in unemployment in the US, the fundamentals could never be stronger,” Callahan Erdoes said.

She said volatility in markets would return to normal and that the lack of volatility in 2017 was an anomaly.

Sponsored Content

“On average, once or twice a week the stock market will have a 1 per cent move either way; in 2017, there were only eight of those days in the whole year,” she explained. “The whole market is moving in sync. Volatility won’t upheave markets, it will take them back to normal. But for those who were affected in 2008, there could be some psychological effect. It’s the greatest time ever for active asset management.”

Guggenheim Partners chair and chief investment officer Scott Minerd warned, however, many excesses were building up. He noted that the ratio of corporate debt to GDP was at a record high. He also said US stimulus fiscal policy was colliding with monetary policy and other strategies, such as in immigration, and there would be a breaking point.

“Labour and immigration is interesting; for example, there are shortages of workers in key areas, like painters and carpenters in real estate,” said Minerd, who sits on the Fed’s investment advisory board alongside JP Morgan’s Callahan Erdoes. Investors should be focused on this because it’s going to lead to something serious.”

While the panel agreed, to a large extent, that fundamentals were strong, Joshua Friedman, co-chief executive of Canyon Partners, who is also on the board of the Harvard University endowment and a trustee at Cal Tech, pointed out that there was a difference between the fundamentals of the economy and how markets perform.

“Markets are creatures of moods,” Friedman said. “The inflows into passive have skyrocketed, so structurally it is a very different market. And the mismatch between assets and liabilities is a problem.”

Ning Tang, chief executive of CreditEase, a Chinese fintech conglomerate specialising in finance and wealth management, also sat on the panel, which addressed the outlook for capital markets.

He said a new era was being driven by China’s middle class of 200 million, with education, healthcare, and all services industries doing well.

“Digital transformation is key for small businesses in China,” Tang said. “The new economy financial system is happening. All the bottlenecks can be solved by technology and small businesses can invest and borrow through their mobile phones. We can lend to them in real time.

“China is asking for a new financial system. In the past, it was dominated by banks but it will shift to more direct markets, like private equity and venture capital, supporting innovation and technology. But investors must know that patient, long-term capital is very new to Chinese investors and regulators. In China, long term means the same day.”

JP Morgan’s Callahan Erdoes – ranked the number one woman in finance by American Banker – says cyber-risk is the single most important danger and everyone should be thinking about it.

“[There’s a] need to worry about keeping control; technology can hijack your whole life,” she said. “Cyber-warfare in this world is unknown and uncontemplated.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Governance, Gonski style

Since becoming chair of the $80-billion Future Fund in March, David Gonski has set an agenda to act like a public company chair. An element of that vision is to very clearly delegate to management. “The general manager has been elevated to a managing director and the six-monthly announcements will be his,” he says. Another

Risk parity manages risk regret

The risk parity approach to portfolio construction might not deliver results in a “bull stockmarket,” but remained a “robust and rigorous” methodology which also “managed risk regret over time.” These are the views of Wai Lee, chief investment officer of quantitive investment at New York-based fund manager Neuberger Berman, who was recently named winner of

African countries come to the sovereign wealth fund party

Many of the countries with the largest oil reserves also boast the largest sovereign wealth funds (SWFs). And yet African producers, like newcomer Ghana, Angola, and Nigeria which has been pumping oil since the 1950s, haven’t saved much of their oil revenue. Now, in an effort to replicate the long-term growth of funds like Norway’s

Regulatory risk in Europe a factor for infrastructure investment

The head of infrastructure at Australia’s $80 billion Future Fund has cited regulatory risk in Europe and the United Kingdom as reasons to be wary about infrastructure investment in the region. Raphael Arndt, the Future Fund’s head of infrastructure and timberlands, told a Sydney conference this week that he was particularly concerned with the situation

Europe’s credit rating crunch

It has been a bad month for credit-rating agency executives who thought they were winning the legal and regulatory arguments about how they conduct their business. In Australia, the Federal Court ruled on November 5 in favour of 12 local councils in New South Wales which claimed that Standard and Poor’s had misled them into

Dutch reform to tread lightly on investment mix

When the Netherlands pension reforms were announced in 2011, many experts argued they were likely to substantially increase the risk appetites at the funds guarding the country’s $1-trillion pension assets. Recent developments to the reform proposals make the overall impact far from clear, however, suggesting there will be no bonanza for Dutch investment managers. The

Previous