Canadian funds prioritise liability matching

Asset allocation has bumped alternative investments as the top investment issue for Canadian defined benefit pension plans, but asset-liability matching will take the cake in the next three years, according to a study by Towers Watson.

Before the financial crisis, 63 per cent of the fund’s surveyed by the consultant said alternative investments was the top issue, followed by asset-liability matching and ideas to increase returns.

After the crisis the key concern for these funds is asset allocation, with a significant 78 per cent recording this as a top issue. In the next three years they report asset-liability matching, asset allocation and ideas to increase returns as the major concerns.

For those motivated to change their investment strategy because of the crisis, stabilising pension plan costs was the number one reason.

Most of the surveyed funds’ assets remain in equities (an approximate 49 per cent allocation for those funds above $1 billion), but decreasing the equities’ exposure is a consistent theme for those how materially changed their target asset mix. Fixed-income and alternatives are the beneficiaries.

Sponsored Content

In a separate survey, measuring institutional investment managers’ perception of clients’ concerns, Towers Watson found asset (re)allocation, risk and underperformance remain the top three issues raised by funds.

Managers expect the risk appetite of institutional clients to increase this year.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Warren Buffett’s excellent adventure

'Youngster’ Warren Buffett (85) rebuffed risks from sugar and climate change as he toured the American economy with his ‘older’ offsider, Charlie Munger (92), presenting at the Berkshire Hathaway AGM .

Pay for performance

Pension fund executive pay varies widely around the globe, with differences based on internal management and alternatives exposures. Amanda White examines pension fund executive pay.

A long way to go

It’s all very well to have diversity, but most people lack the tools for how to get the best out of a diverse team. Instead the reverse is true and diversity can lead to an unlevel playing field.

Too much of a good thing

Experts at the Thinking Ahead Institute outline the pitfalls of implementing team diversity, , when too much diversity fails us, and how organisations can be champions for change.

Income the key dimension

Risk should be defined as the inability to meet retirement income goals, so investors and their managers should forget alpha and other “distractions”, according to David Booth.

Worlds colliding

The debate about the effect of pay inequality on both the financial and real-world markets is about to get a whole lot hotter this year.

Previous