CalSTRS boosts infrastructure exposure

The unique pension fund-owned structure of Industry Funds Management contributed to it winning a large infrastructure mandate from the $144.8 billion CalSTRS, whose risk-based view of the world has it looking for inflation-hedging diversification.

IFM, which is owned by 32 not-for-profit Australian pension funds, has been awarded a mandate of up to $500 million from the California fund to invest in a diversified portfolio of core infrastructure assets in North America and Europe.

IFM was a pioneer in infrastructure investing in Australia, investing since 1994. It has been investing globally since 2004 when it first bought a stake in Arqiva, the UK broadcasting towers.

Its portfolio now also includes the largest heating and distribution company in Poland, Dalkia, power utilities in the US and Germany and water and gas utilities in the UK.

For CalSTRS, which is relatively new to infrastructure investing, it addresses the goal for greater diversification in areas that would also serve as a hedge against inflation.

Inflation risk is one of six core factor risks for the fund, as part of its new approach to portfolio construction, which involves overlaying the risks across the portfolio.

Sponsored Content

The other risk factors are global economic growth, interest rate risk, liquidity, leverage and investment governance risk.

The fund’s target asset allocation at the end of December was a 2 per cent allocation to inflation-sensitive assets.

It also had a 1 per cent allocation to cash, 12 per cent allocation to private equity, 12 per cent allocation to real estate, 20 per cent to fixed income and 53 per cent to global equity.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous