CalPERS’ securities lending loss

CalPERS will continue its securities lending program following an annual review, despite significant pressure on its collateral pool, with income of $220 million generated for the year to March but unrealised losses on the internal collateral reinvestment of $854 million.

In a report to the board, the fund’s consultant, Wilshire said the significant unrealised loss in the collateral pool is likely to result in a total eventual loss to the fund of between $500 million and $1 billion.

This is due to the drop in prices on a lot of instruments purchased by CalPERS, with some securities defaulting or expected to default.

In an effort to limit any additional losses, the investment team has restricted all new investments to overnight securities, as they work out the damage to the collateral pool.

The internal staff annual review of the securities lending program confirmed the use of the program, a decision endorsed by Wilshire’s assessment.

In the past 12 months the fund held four auctions awarding more than $113 billion in assets to 11 borrowers, and in the past eight years CalPERS has auctioned off access to $835 billion in assets through 33 separate auctions, with cumulative net earnings of $1.4 billion.

Sponsored Content

Despite the failure, and merger, of several large counterparties over the past year, CalPERS has suffered no losses from defaults in any of its securities on loan.

According to Wilshire, CalPERS, like other lenders, requires over-collateralisation for all loans, and has simply kept the collateral, for no gain or loss, when a counterparty defaulted or declared bankruptcy. CalPERS had lent money to Lehman Brothers but incurred no losses on its default.

For the year to the end of March 2009, the average market value of securities on loan for the year was $33.5 billion, with annualised earnings of 23 bps. The large unrealised loss amount was due to CalPERS use of mark-to-market accounting on the valuation of the internal cash pool, which is not market convention on collateral reinvestment pools. The external portfolios use amortised cost pricing.

“This success reinforces the value of the auction platform and the demand in the marketplace to borrow CalPERS’ - the internal staff report said.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Cambridge to lift Asian presence with Beijing office

Cambridge Associates, the US-based asset consultancy, is to open a Beijing office – its third office in the Asia Pacific region – and is sending a private equity specialist there from London.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Demographic problem mostly about haves and have-nots

The demographics driving the funds management industry, of ageing populations almost everywhere, are more complicated than you think. Greg Bright spoke to the Asia Pacific leader for Towers Watson, Bob Charles, who is a demographics expert, about the real demographic problems facing the world.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Equities lose out to bonds for Europe’s sustainable investors

Bonds are the favoured asset class at 53 per cent among European sustainable and responsible investors with equities dropping to 33 per cent, according to a Eurosif SRI report.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Tail risk hedging should be part of broader strategy

With bond yields at historic lows, particularly in the US, pension funds have been searching for new forms of downside protection to reduce tail risk, boosting demand for certain types of hedge funds in the process. In the US, too, where demand is invariably met by a quick supply of new products, specialist ‘tail-risk funds’

Endowment funds turn to alternatives

Foundation and endowment funds are allocating the largest percentage of alternatives to their portfolios, with public funds coming second ahead corporate plans in third place.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

The case for a new look at global benchmarks

Indexes are important for pension funds. They benchmark the fund’s performance against goals and peers. They allow the fund’s managers to be measured and often times they decide the managers’ remuneration. You would think, then, that there must be a lot of science behind their use.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous