CalPERS saves $20m a year on fees

CalPERS has negotiated about $20 million in annual cost savings through a reduction of fees in its alternatives manager program and millions saved through a renegotiated contract with UBS.

UBS is a third party advisor to the absolute return strategy program, alongside PAAMCO.

According to a presentation to the investment committee by chief investment officer Joe Dear, a cost saving of $6 million was achieved through a renegotiated UBS contract.

A reduction of fees and costs in the alternative investment manager program also achieved annual cost savings of $7.4 million.

In addition, the removal of underperforming managers and renegotiated manager fees in global equities achieved an expected annual savings of $7.5million.

Improving cost effectiveness is one of the overarching priorities of the fund’s “investment roadmap”.

Sponsored Content

In the next six months the fund will complete benchmarking the investment office’s costs, staffing and resource structure against comparable organisations. It is working with CEM Benchmarking.

The fund outlined a set of priorities it will deliver over the next six months which, in addition to cost effectiveness, also include the development of a forestland strategic plan, a final implementation plan for its ESG strategy and the rollout of a new risk management program.

In addition to strategic plans, the fund has a number of execution-related priorities for the next six months. These include the alternative investment management division finalising two separate account mandates, and the real estate team finalising agreements with core partners.

Some of the investment highlights in the past six months include completing the implementation of a new asset allocation framework, insourcing $8 billion in global fixed income assets, and funding and managing a new $7 billion liquidity portfolio.

In the past six months the fund also formed an investment compliance and operational risk division and held a sustainable investing workshop with the investment committee regarding the integration of ESG factors.

The overriding investment roadmap strategic priorities are: achieve investment performance targets; establish new capital allocation framework; strengthen risk management; strengthen organisation systems and controls; improve cost effectiveness; and enhance talent management.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous