CalPERS to link pay with performance

The CalPERS board will have the discretion to reduce or eliminate investment staff performance pay in years of negative performance of the fund, in a revised compensation plan to be presented to the board this week, chief investment officer Joe Dear told conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com.

“We are also proposing to simplify asset class level payments so the components for portfolio managers are more simple,” he said, demonstrating with an example that one portfolio manager had seven different levels of measurement.

“We are going to present a revised compensation plan for the board, we’ve done a lot of work on this,” he said.

Dear said a fair and transparent compensation model for investment staff was part of the investment management balance between art and science.

“We want to have an increasingly visible and transparent process so it encourages debate… we want to do the art along with the science.”

Sponsored Content

The fund has had its existing investment office compensation program since 1997 when it was designed by Watson Wyatt, but it hired Mercer Consulting to review the program in December last year.

Mercer highlighted some of the challenges that CalPERS, and other organizations face, including:

1. Attracting high visibility and scrutiny as a large, public entity;

2. Fielding questions about the relative performance design component common to investment office incentive plans, such as how can the plan pay-out incentives when the fund value is down;

3. Attracting and retaining high calibre investment professionals to the non-Wall Street investment community;

4. Providing creative alternatives for compensation investment professionals that are fair, competitive and reasonable; and

5. Simplifying investment compensation strategies to promote transparency.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous