CalPERS, CalSTRS champion for diversity

The Californian pension funds, CalPERS and CalSTRS, have taken a leadership role in promoting corporate board diversity, demonstrated in the launch at the NYSE this week of 3D with GMI Ratings, and membership in the Thirty Percent Coalition.

3D, which stands for Diverse Director DataSource, is a databank of pre-approved board candidates with an emphasis on highlighting people with fresh ideas and new perspectives.

The initiative is consistent with the funds’ focus on long-term shareowner value.

Anne Sheehan, director of corporate governance at the $150-billion CalSTRS, says 3D is a market solution to a supply-and-demand problem.

“As promoters of long-term shareowner value, we’ve been demanding greater diversity on the corporate boards of our portfolio companies for some time. Now we’re prepared to provide a tool to supply corporate-search firms and nominating committees with a deep breadth of quality board candidates. These professionals can not only do the job, but approach issues from diverse perspectives forged by a wide variety of backgrounds and experience, as well as by gender or ethnicity.”

Anne Simpson, CalPERS senior portfolio manager and director of global governance, says 3D is an innovative resource that opens the door to finding candidates whose fresh ideas and new perspectives can help companies generate lasting value and provide a check against the kind of ‘group think’ that played a significant role in the financial crisis.

Sponsored Content

Chair of GMI Ratings, Richard Bennett, says corporate boards work best when they reflect a diversity of perspective and experience.

“With 3D, we created an accessible resource to help companies and recruiting firms identify and recruit candidates sometimes overlooked under traditional search processes. We encourage candidates to continue submitting their credentials for review.”

GMI Ratings is an independent provider of global corporate-governance ratings and research.

It makes business sense to embrace more women

Separately the funds, as part of the Thirty Percent Coalition, sent a letter urging change to the 41 S&P500 companies that do not have any women on their boards.

The Thirty Percent Coalition is a group of pension funds, state officials, fund managers and women’s groups that is pressing for gender diversity on corporate boards.

According to reports by Catalyst, ION and Governance Metrics International, women only hold between 12 and 16 per cent of corporate board seats.

Studies have shown there is a correlation between greater gender diversity among corporate boards and management, good corporate governance and long-term financial performance.

The Thirty Percent Coalition project leader, Charlotte Laurent-Ottomane, says substantial research underscores the correlation between gender diversity, good governance and positive long-term corporate performance.

“We are urging the business community to embrace this elemental truth.”

The letter references quotas being adopted in numerous countries around the world to increase the number of women on corporate boards but proposes instead that companies in the US voluntarily embrace more ambitious diversity goals because it makes business sense.

The group has set a three-year time line by which it would like to see 30 per cent of corporate board seats held by women.

CalSTRS’ Sheehan says the group intends to follow up and engage with each of the 41 companies, asking them to “welcome women to their boards”.

“Whether it’s in dialogue with management, through shareholder resolutions or related strategies, we intend to press for change. And then we’ll move beyond the S&P500 to other companies as well. Our goal is to continue engaging companies until women hold at least 30 per cent of corporate board seats across the United States.”

Of nine board members at CalSTRS, women hold three positions, including the chair, Dana Dillon.

At CalPERS there are only two women on the board.

 

One response to “CalPERS, CalSTRS champion for diversity”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Maverick Series video: Gonski part I

In the first of a new series of video interviews featuring thought leaders in global institutional investment, chair of the $80 billion Australian Future Fund, David Gonski, outlines his views on governance. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

ATP reunites alpha and beta after 6 years

Alpha and beta rely to a large extent on exposures to systematic risk factors, so goes the “2013 thinking” of ATP in reversing the decision to separate alpha and beta in its investment portfolio six years ago. ATP has separate hedging and investment portfolios, with the hedging portfolio significantly larger at around DKK 670 billion

State Street’s Probyn into 2013

The current equity rally is not predicated on a shift in economic performance, according to chief economist at State Street, Chris Probyn, who says it would be reasonable to say the market may “pause for thought”. Probyn says the move from fixed income to equities has been fostered by some of the “economic areas for

CalPERS’ sustainability initiative drives investment beliefs

Launched this week, CalPERS’ Sustainable Investment Research Initiative (SIRI) will drive the development the $250-billion fund’s first set of investment beliefs. While difficult to believe a fund of its size, reach and history could invest without a set of investment beliefs, it is encouraging to see that sustainability will be a core part of that

Finnish pension reform a lesson for all

The findings from the first review of the Finnish pension system, commissioned by the Finnish Centre for Pensions, were handed down by Nicholas Barr from the London School of Economics and Keith Ambachtsheer from the Rotman International Centre for Pension Management last month. Although Helsinki in January is far from a party Ambachtsheer and Barr

European investors stay on the offensive

2012 was a year of battles for European pension funds. An ongoing war was waged against a severe regulatory challenge from the European Commission in the shape of Solvency II-style legislation. Aside from the uncertain struggle of that campaign, major European investors gained plenty of credit from standing up to corporate boards in the “shareholder

Previous