CalPERS, CalSTRS champion for diversity

The Californian pension funds, CalPERS and CalSTRS, have taken a leadership role in promoting corporate board diversity, demonstrated in the launch at the NYSE this week of 3D with GMI Ratings, and membership in the Thirty Percent Coalition.

3D, which stands for Diverse Director DataSource, is a databank of pre-approved board candidates with an emphasis on highlighting people with fresh ideas and new perspectives.

The initiative is consistent with the funds’ focus on long-term shareowner value.

Anne Sheehan, director of corporate governance at the $150-billion CalSTRS, says 3D is a market solution to a supply-and-demand problem.

“As promoters of long-term shareowner value, we’ve been demanding greater diversity on the corporate boards of our portfolio companies for some time. Now we’re prepared to provide a tool to supply corporate-search firms and nominating committees with a deep breadth of quality board candidates. These professionals can not only do the job, but approach issues from diverse perspectives forged by a wide variety of backgrounds and experience, as well as by gender or ethnicity.”

Anne Simpson, CalPERS senior portfolio manager and director of global governance, says 3D is an innovative resource that opens the door to finding candidates whose fresh ideas and new perspectives can help companies generate lasting value and provide a check against the kind of ‘group think’ that played a significant role in the financial crisis.

Sponsored Content

Chair of GMI Ratings, Richard Bennett, says corporate boards work best when they reflect a diversity of perspective and experience.

“With 3D, we created an accessible resource to help companies and recruiting firms identify and recruit candidates sometimes overlooked under traditional search processes. We encourage candidates to continue submitting their credentials for review.”

GMI Ratings is an independent provider of global corporate-governance ratings and research.

It makes business sense to embrace more women

Separately the funds, as part of the Thirty Percent Coalition, sent a letter urging change to the 41 S&P500 companies that do not have any women on their boards.

The Thirty Percent Coalition is a group of pension funds, state officials, fund managers and women’s groups that is pressing for gender diversity on corporate boards.

According to reports by Catalyst, ION and Governance Metrics International, women only hold between 12 and 16 per cent of corporate board seats.

Studies have shown there is a correlation between greater gender diversity among corporate boards and management, good corporate governance and long-term financial performance.

The Thirty Percent Coalition project leader, Charlotte Laurent-Ottomane, says substantial research underscores the correlation between gender diversity, good governance and positive long-term corporate performance.

“We are urging the business community to embrace this elemental truth.”

The letter references quotas being adopted in numerous countries around the world to increase the number of women on corporate boards but proposes instead that companies in the US voluntarily embrace more ambitious diversity goals because it makes business sense.

The group has set a three-year time line by which it would like to see 30 per cent of corporate board seats held by women.

CalSTRS’ Sheehan says the group intends to follow up and engage with each of the 41 companies, asking them to “welcome women to their boards”.

“Whether it’s in dialogue with management, through shareholder resolutions or related strategies, we intend to press for change. And then we’ll move beyond the S&P500 to other companies as well. Our goal is to continue engaging companies until women hold at least 30 per cent of corporate board seats across the United States.”

Of nine board members at CalSTRS, women hold three positions, including the chair, Dana Dillon.

At CalPERS there are only two women on the board.

 

One response to “CalPERS, CalSTRS champion for diversity”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous