Californian funds look through 3D to diversify boards

The two large Californian public funds, CalPERS and CalSTRS, recently collaborated to help develop a new digital resource dedicated to finding untapped diverse talent to serve on corporate boards. Director of corporate governance at CalSTRS, Anne Sheehan (pictured), discusses the need for such a resource, and why collaboration is such a key component of corporate governance.

For the past couple of years, the California State Teachers’ Retirement System (CalSTRS) and the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) have been working with an advisory panel of leading corporate governance experts to develop a new digital resource devoted to finding untapped diverse talent to serve on corporate boards.

The Diverse Director DataSource, known as “3D”, will offer its subscribers – which will most likely be shareowners and companies – a facility from which to recruit individuals whose experience, skills and knowledge qualify them to be a candidate for a director’s seat.

“3D has been in the works for a couple of years. We have been collaborating with CalPERS, and an alliance of interested firms, diversity groups, headhunters, and investors, to get a pool of talent to act as a source for appointing board members,” the director of corporate governance at CalSTRS, Anne Sheehan, says.

The focus is not just on “traditional” diversity, such as gender and ethnicity, but also diversity of skill sets, backgrounds, and perspectives.

“There is a lack of diversity of thought on boards. We want to see different perspectives on the issue, and a general encouragement of diversity of thought,” Sheehan says.

Sponsored Content

The 3D resource will be a data source, acting as a kind of “bench” of people from non-traditional board backgrounds which will be made available to subscribers, who will then be responsible for screening them for the particular position.

While with this particular resource, neither pension fund will be involved with choosing or recommending board members, CalSTRS has indulged in recommending board members before, through the engagement process.

The most vocal of those was the recommendation, with Relational Investors, of a board member at Occidental Petroleum, the culmination of engagement over the oil company’s compensation practices and the board’s failure to abide by its retirement policy, or announce a succession plan for its long-serving chief executive and chairman.

“Through our engagement process we sometimes recommend people for boards,” Sheehan says. “When we do engagement or litigation, 3D is a potential source for us.”

In the past year or so, the issue of majority vote has remained the most debated topic at CalSTRS, with 28 of the 39 shareholder resolutions this year on majority vote.

“Majority vote is an emphasis this year, it’s basic. Why should a board member sit in a meeting when they’re not a majority vote representation,” she says.

To this end CalSTRS is one of a group of investors in the US that have collaborated, and divided the market, in order to ensure full coverage.

“CalSTRS takes on the mid-cap market, CalPERS the S&P500 and Florida sent a letter to the Russell 2000,” she says.

CalSTRS’ corporate governance program includes about $3 billion with activist managers as part of its global equities. It is a relatively new program, with Sheehan only in the job since October 2008. Much of its engagement is based on improving performance and reducing the risk of underperforming companies, but it is yet to develop any meaningful measurement – that is the next step.

The corporate governance program is based on four strategic objectives: proxy voting, executive compensation, board diversity and sustainability risk management.

Sheehan, who is also a member of the Council for Institutional Investors, and the NASDAQ listing council, says the fund will continue to look at poor performers and engage with them on issues such as the separation of chair and chief executive positions.

“You need to de-personalise it when talking to those individuals and discuss the structure, not the individuals, going forward,” she says.

CalSTRS is keen to lead by example when it comes to corporate governance, and Sheehan says there is often a discussion at the board level about keeping its own house in order.

“Every pension fund board has its own balance. We constantly discuss at the board if we throw stones then we have to have our own house in order,” she says noting CalSTRS was an early mover on pay to play and implementing a placement agent policy, by way of example.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous