…as New Mexico Governor latest to ban third-party marketers

The New Mexico Governor, Bill Richardson has directed the State Investment Office to ban the use of third-party placement agents on investments of the state’s Permanent Funds, and directed the Education Retirement Board to move forward with a six-month ban on third-party marketers as it evaluates the long-term implications of a permanent ban.

The New Mexico State Investment Office and the state’s Education Retirement Board were also recently directed
by Richardson to terminate contracts with private equity advisor, Aldus Equity.

In addition an independent review of investment practices and policies, including the use of third-party marketers, has been commissioned and the state Board of Finance and the Legislative Council Service will work on the scope of the review, as well as an appropriate budget.

“I feel strongly that a ban on these agents is necessary to restore confidence in our investment practices,”the Governor said. “The practice of fund managers paying huge fees to third-party agents may be legal and legitimate, but the potential for a conflict of interest is troubling. I’d rather remove that potential conflict and be confident that our investments are not tainted in any way.”

The move by New Mexico is the latest in a raft of public pension plans putting bans on placement agents, with the New York City Employees’ Retirement System and the New York City Policy Pension Fund among others already placing bans on the use of placement agents.

The New York Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo, is leading the pension fund investigation and as a result of a meeting with 36 Attorneys General’s offices has created a multi-state task force to share information explore pension fund abuse.

Sponsored Content

“The task force will allow us to have a unified, efficient method for gathering information as we fight to combat corruption and restore transparency and integrity to public pension funds,” he said. “Pension funds across the country are now taking appropriate steps to clean up abuses – but we should not forget that the real goal must be systemic reform so we can avoid continually closing the barn door after the horse has bolted the stable.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous