Around the world with 12 themes

The stockpicking view of Mark Tinker, global portfolio manager of Axa Framlington, has been greatly influenced by his career on the sell side of the investment management business. He spoke to Amanda White about a thematic approach to global equities and why, uniquely, two new themes have emerged in the wake of the financial crisis and why China fits into all 12 of them.


Mark Tinker has spent only three years of his career in the investment industry working in funds management. The remaining 22 years were spent in research at investment banks, and this experience has fashioned his stock picking process.

As lead fund manager of global equities at Axa Framlington in London, he manages the thematic equities product, which, as the name suggests, is driven by a top-down view of the world in accordance with various themes.

Currently there are 12 themes and, as a result of the past two years, two new themes have emerged which he has coined as: pay as you go consumption, and the pricing power of capital.

“I wouldn’t normally come up with new themes, the world doesn’t move that fast, but last year it did,” he says.

The pricing power of capital, which with a September weighting of 15 per cent is second in the portfolio only to the Asian consumer theme, is directed by the general thought that capital is cheap but scarce.

Sponsored Content

He points to the emergence of a global nifty 50, which will be a very powerful single theme over the next few years, and companies such as Walmart, which he bought because its pricing power has changed fit into this category.

Of the top 10 holdings in the portfolio, five of the stocks are directed by this theme – Johnson & Johnson, Credit Suisse Group, Procter & Gamble, Coca-Cola and Google.

Axa Framlington’s approach is to start from the top with the full universe of 7000 companies, and guided by its pre-determined but evolving themes, such as the emerging Asian consumer, infrastructure, global trade and green technology, it filters that down to about 1500.

Tinker says this is filtered further according to a “does it work” philosophy, with a more qualitative assessment as the final determinant.

To do this, Tinker is happy to use sell side expertise, in an “expert witness kind of way”, with the valuation process undertaken in house.

“My approach to global is: I am global to maximise the opportunity set, but I don’t want to find the best stock in a bad market, I want unconstrained global,” he says.

But while themes dominate the top-down assessment, he says it is also essential to go back to basics.

“The real long-term return is generated by the company you’ve allocated to, so you have to be bottom up,” he says. “This also means the amount allocated to each of our themes is a bottom up process, this is key because they are not baskets but a guiding premise.”

For example Tinker says the themes of global trade, energy, and emerging growth transferred to a higher weighting to emerging markets. But then another series of what Tinker calls “policy errors” with the Bank of England and Bank of China increasing interest rates, global growth was stunted, so the emerging markets exposure was decreased.

Tinker believes there is an element of China in all of the themes.

For example, the changing consumer habits theme.

“The Chinese government is building infrastructure and service infrastructure, like hospitals. A hospital visit will cost you a year’s salary at the moment, but with the government infrastructure improvements that capital can be freed for spending,” he says. “This translates to individual companies. For example, Procter and Gamble are saying to me, they are decreasing their price points in the West and increasing their price in the East.”

Tinker acknowledges at times he may have similar companies in the portfolio to other global funds managers, but they are there for different reasons.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous