Alaska focuses on infrastructure

Infrastructure co-investments will be a new area of focus for the $36.6 billion Alaska Permanent Fund, as reflected in changes to its strategic asset allocation last week.

In July 2009 the fund changed the way it allocated assets – looking at underlying risks or economic conditions, not asset buckets – with a view to building an all-weather portfolio. It came up with five categories: company exposures, real assets, special opportunities, interest rates and cash.

This latest asset allocation tweak sees company exposures increase by 2 per cent to 55 per cent of the allocation, and infrastructure increase from 3 to 4 per cent.

The special opportunities bucket has been reduced as a result from 21 to 18 per cent.

While the company exposures allocation has been increased, it will not require new mandates, as existing mezzanine debt and credit opportunity mandates have been transferred from the special opportunities bucket.

Within the special opportunities, Alaska has embraced the “external CIO” concept, and awarded seed mandates of $500 million to five managers – PIMCO, GMO, Bridgewater, AQR and Goldman Sachs.

Sponsored Content

At last week’s board meeting, changes to the infrastructure investment policy were approved to allow investments in infrastructure funds based on the recommendation of an independent fiduciary, and to add authority to co-invest subject to a board-approved process.

The 1 per cent increase in the target allocation will allow room for this asset class to grow over the next few years.

Infrastructure is part of the real assets exposure, which also includes real estate and TIPs.

The fund, which returned 20.6 per cent for the 2011 financial year, has re-elected Bill Moran (pictured) as chair and Steve Rieger as vice-chair at its annual meeting.

It is still without a chief investment officer following the resignation of Jeff Scott.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous