$100b mismatch in private equity secondaries demand and supply

Recessions are traditionally considered a good time to invest in private equity, but liquidity constraints and the growth of unlisted assets within portfolios is causing pension funds to sit on the sideline. Sally Collier, London-based partner at global private equity fund of funds Pantheon Ventures, said there was a US$100 billion “mismatch” between the funds available for investment in the secondaries market and the “tidal wave of supply”.

The fall in prices and more moderation in leverage structures should present good opportunities for investment going forward, Collier said.

While the $174 billion CalPERS and the $36.9 billion Harvard University endowment have been among the sellers of private equity during the financial crisis, Collier said most institutional investors were maintaining their allocations.

The level of capital calls was not very high because investments were not being made at a high rate, she added.

“The beauty of private equity is it’s a cash return,” Collier said. “We don’t see so many pension funds selling.”

She described the secondaries market as a “buyers’ market” but warned pension funds to be tread carefully due to the wide dispersion of returns available.

Sponsored Content

“The return variability [of private equity] is nine times the public markets. In times of difficulty that dispersion probably widens,” she said.

“That’s exactly what we are seeing at the moment – therefore the premium for getting it right is even stronger.”

Anna Hocking, senior manager, investor services Australia at Russell Investments, said many Australian super funds had recognised the opportunities for investment in the private equity market but were “not necessarily able to take advantage of them because of liquidity and the denominator effect”.

The denominator effect describes the rise in unlisted assets within pension portfolios as the value of listed assets falls.

CalPERS sold off around $2.1 billion in fund interests in a number of secondary transactions starting in the third quarter of 2007 and finishing in August 2008.

Harvard, which manages the largest US endowment, put around $1.5 billion of stakes in private equity funds on the market in 2007.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous