TPI’s ambitious path to low carbon

The first challenge for anyone connected with the Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) is to explain what it is. TPI is a simple but powerful open-access tool for asset owners and fund managers to map what the transition to a low-carbon economy looks like for companies in high-emitting sectors. TPI uses publicly disclosed information, collected by FTSE Russell and validated by the Grantham Research Institute at the London School of Economics.

This research enables investors and other stakeholders to make informed judgements about how companies with the biggest impact on climate change are adapting their business models to prepare for a transition to low carbon, supporting efforts to address climate change. The TPI is less than two years old and is already supported by investors representing more than $13 trillion in assets under management, including the likes of Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), Legal & General Investment Management, Willis Towers Watson, BNP Paribas Asset Management, AP1, AP3, AP4, and its founders – the Church of England National Investing Bodies and the Environment Agency Pension Fund.

Expanding our ambition

Even fast-growing initiatives do not have it made. My first aim as the new director of TPI is to expand our reach by bringing more investors on board from all corners of the world. Climate change is a global issue and TPI needs to attract more investor supporters globally, particularly from Asia and the US. The need for a more global reach applies to the companies we assess, too.

A particular focus is Asia. Half of the world’s top six emitters are from Asia, and we need investors there to use their influence to improve climate-related financial reporting and, in time, to drive the transition to a low-carbon economy.

My second goal is to broaden and deepen the scope of our research. To date, we’ve paid close attention to carbon-intense sectors such as automobile, paper, steel, cement, and oil and gas. It’s encouraging to see this research paying off, with the likes of Shell recently committing to strong, long-term carbon emissions targets. We are now setting our sights on other high-polluting sectors, such as aviation and aluminium, with plans to tackle chemicals and agriculture further down the line.

Sponsored Content

TPI also needs to look beyond the biggest corporations. To date, our sector-based research has tended to focus on the largest companies by market capitalisation; however, it is important that we also look at those companies that may be less valuable but just as significant to achieving the Paris Agreement goals. This is important not only in expanding the total amount of global emissions that we assess, but also in helping more investors understand the climate performance of more of the companies in their portfolio.

The challenges ahead

Most things worth doing are not without difficulty.

Getting our hands on meaningful carbon and environmental data, particularly in emerging markets, is perhaps our biggest challenge. We need more investors to use their influence as shareholders and owners to urge better disclosure from companies through platforms like the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP).Regulation and carbon pricing also have a role to play in encouraging more and higher-quality disclosure on greenhouse-gas emissions.

Finally, we mustn’t ignore those sectors where it is more difficult to assess climate performance. Finance, for example, may have relatively low direct emissions, but it provides the funds behind some of the largest climate culprits. Of course, it’s harder to reliably assess the environmental performance of companies that are one step back from the frontline on climate, but we are determined to do so.

As we move into our next phase of development, our ultimate aim is for the TPI to become the ‘go to’ tool capital markets use globally to assess where they are on the transition to a low-carbon economy. It’s a critical part of the puzzle if we are to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement. I look forward to embracing both the challenges and opportunities ahead.

Nadine Viel Lamare is director of the Transition Pathway

Read more at: www.transitionpathwayinitiative.org

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

Long-term approach needed more than ever

Chief investment officer of the world’s largest pension fund the $1.5 trillion GPIF, Hiro Mizuno, says large institutional investors must stay calm and maintain their long term investment course. He told Top1000funds.com that “long term investment is needed more than ever before”.

Experts call for price on carbon, now

Last Thursday, March 12 the US Senate Democrats’ Special Committee on the Climate Crisis heard from industry experts, including Bob Litterman and Frederic Samama, on the economic risks of climate change. They all pushed for a price on carbon and for action, now.

Investing in the 2020s

Change is on the horizon, and where there is change, there is disruption, Mercer’s global strategic research director advises investors to be clear on timeframes, be prepared for business as unusual and position portfolios for climate change. The next decade is likely to prove more challenging — now is not the time to give up on diversification.

Church of England’s transition index

Being passively invested shouldn’t mean being passive with regard to responsibilities says the Church of England Pension Board which has developed a new climate transition index with FTSE Russell, LSE and TPI that is the first to incorporate forward-looking climate data.

US public pension funds lag on climate

Only 16 of the 74 largest public pension plans in the US mention ESG or responsible investing in their public documents. Scott Kalb looks at why the US is so far behind.

Scientific Beta critiques TEG benchmarks

Scientific Beta has critiqued the proposals of the TEG on climate benchmarks, arguing they are unduly influenced by commercial interests and do little to discourage greenwashing or support decarbonisation efforts in the real economy.

Previous