New guide for implementing climate risks

Cracked Ground From The Indian Subcontinent

The Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) have worked together to produce a practical guide for companies looking to implement the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

While more than 600 organisations have supported the TCFD, the implementation of its recommendations have been slow, so CDSB and SASB have drawn on their well-established reporting frameworks to produce the guide that shows companies, in a very practical way, how to implement the recommendations.

Director of research at SASB, David Parham, said there has been great interest from companies wishing to manage their exposure to climate risk, demonstrated by their commitment to the TCFD proposals.

“But one of the challenges has been in companies needing practical resources to implement the recommendations. Through our partnership, and our standards,we can give practical tools to companies to effectively implement.”

The guide is rooted in practical examples with “mock disclosures” created for three fictional companies in the oil and gas, automobile and agriculture industries.

“We chose those industries to show how each of them have very different climate-related risk exposure, and demonstrate how to use the tools to really robustly meet the TCFD recommendations – which can be done in any of those three industries using our guidance,” Parham said.

Sponsored Content

Institutional investors can take comfort in the fact that the frameworks used for disclosure are focused on disclosure information that is material to investors, Parham said.

“Investors can help advocate and encourage companies to use the framework so investors can get the information they need. It is also useful fromthe perspective of seeing how the quantitative metrics can inform an investors’ understanding of howthe companies are performing, and then interpret the effectiveness of a company’s governance of this risk and risk management of its strategy,” he said. “It can help investors see how important it is to have continuity and how KPIs help drive performance.”

It is also important for investors to have an understanding of how different reporting frameworks can work together to enhance the quality of information they are receiving, he added.

When the TCFD released its final recommendation in 2017, its chair Michael Bloomberg, who is also chair-emeritus of the SASB Foundation Board, said the widespread adoption of the taskforce’s recommendations would ensure that the effects of climate change become routinely considered in business and investment decisions.

“Adoption of these recommendations will also help companies better demonstrate responsibility and foresight in their consideration of climate issues. That will lead to smarter, more efficient allocation of capital, and help smooth the transition to a more sustainable, low-carbon economy,” he said in a letter to Mark Carney, chairman of the Financial Stability Board,at the launch of the report.

The premise of the new guide is to demonstrate that the principles-based TCFD recommendations can be less daunting to implement than they might originally appear.

 

 

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

Focusing on the long term: a guide

Investors say they  like to, and want to, focus on the long term, but they often don’t know how to change their practices to orient their governance and investments to do so. Now, finally, a guide has been developed for investors to use as benchmark for implementing strategies for long-term investment. The guide is an

London investment think-tank

Investment professionals from pension funds, endowments and family offices in the UK and Europe were brought together for an investment think-tank with leading academics from London Business School and Cambridge University to discuss the latest investment thinking and application to institutional investors’ portfolios. The academics presented to the investors who then discussed the outtakes and

2015 could be watershed year for ESG issues

2015 is poised to be the turning point as a number of key issues relating to environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues take centre stage says Fiona Reynolds, managing director of the Principles for Responsible Investment.   First and foremost is climate change. With the Paris talks scheduled for December 2015, it’s an issue that

ESG factors take centre stage in the evolving world of the fiduciary

The modern responsibilities of the fiduciary investor extend beyond what are perceived as the “mainstream” investment issues to those related to environment, society and governance (ESG) factors. But there is a growing understanding among fiduciaries that ESG considerations are now equally important in discharging their obligations. David Wood, adjunct lecturer in public policy and director of the Initiative for Responsible

Investigating long-term mandates

The PRI is investigating the experiences of asset owners that have engaged service providers in long-term mandates, and conducting a literature review on long-termism, in a bid to develop a reference guide on how to implement a long-term mandate and drive long-term behaviour.   Managing director of PRI, Fiona Reynolds, said the starting point, and

Risks are multi-faceted and evolving: Litterman

If Robert Litterman were a CIO of a public pension plan he would not try to hit an “unrealistic return target”. Amanda White speaks to him about risk, quants, asset allocation and climate change. There is a serious problem with US public pension funds and the “unrealistic commitments and unrealistic return targets” they have set,

Previous