Axa gets behind tobacco-free portfolios

Axa divested from tobacco in 2016 making it one of the first global insurance companies to do so. It has taken that a step further and now doesn’t insure tobacco companies. Amanda White speaks to the chair of Axa, Denis Duverne, on why this is a natural part of the company’s strategy.

Amanda White: Why is it important for your portfolio to be tobacco free?

Denis Duverne: Tobacco kills 7.5 million people per annum and that is likely to grow with emerging markets getting more affluent. As investors we have a responsibility to invest responsibily and it makes no sense to be a health insurer and invest in tobacco

Has it had an impact on returns?

It is too early to say if it has impacted returns. At the time of the decision there was a big discussion at CalPERS and when they took the decision to divest I also made that decision. And then I started to make calls to other investors to introduce the idea of tobacco free portfolios. (CalPERS did well to snuff out tobacco)

We can only really have an impact if there are more sellers than buyers, so we need this intiative to grow

Sponsored Content

What is your opinion of divestment versus engagement as a way to influence companies?

This is very different from the energy debate. Our first big divestment was from coal, our initial stance was divestment from coal manufacturers and energy suppliers with more than 50 per cent revenue from coal. We could have an engagement with them because there is an alternative, but with tobacco there is no alternative. Engagement doesn’t make any sense. They are very smart people, and very decisive and we want to avoid them.

The decision has been very well received by employees and by investors. We went way beyond divesting, and have stopped insuring tobacco companies. Most decisions matter, the only way to have an impact

The decision to divest is consistent with your corporate responsibility strategy can you talk a bit more about that?

Our corporate responsibility strategy is part of our strategy, it is not something on the side. It is a three pronged approach.

First is climate – a 3 degrees world would be totally uninsurable so we are fully inline with our strategy so in line to invest with a climate sustainable strategy

The second is health, tobacco is one element of that. We also invest in medical research including prevention activities – health can improve a lot by prevention.

Inequality – the SDGs are good for society and we think we are can have an impact by providing insurance to those that don’t currently have it eg through micro finance

All companies, managers, owners and insurance companies should make sure the strategy is aligned with the SDGs and within that health, inequality and poverty are part of those objectives.

Tobacco kills and that will increase if we do nothing.

If you want to be consistent with your own objectives you should look carefully at tobacco free as part of the solution.

 

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

Brunel keeps wary eye on markets and raises manager reporting duties

In a recently published review, Brunel Pension Partnership vows to “turn the screws” on managers and its holdings via increased RI expectations and warns that rosier economic forecasts of lower interest rates and tamed inflation may not come true.

PGGM revamps fixed income; focuses on liquidity

PGGM's Wilfried Bolt explains how the end of quantitative easing (QE) has changed the asset manager's hedging strategy and prompted a keen focus on liquidity. He also explains the rationale behind managing more of the corporate bond allocation in house.

Early adopters to nature related disclosure nut out challenges

NBIM, KLP, AP7 and CIV are integrating new nature-related risks in their portfolios in accordance with TNFD recommendations. In contrast to the focus on emissions in sister framework TCFD, a key challenge is finding a cause to hone in on given nature is frequently complex and intangible.

Investors need to face up to commodity realities in the energy transition

Commodities are at the heart of the energy transition, impacting both the coming structural decline of fossil fuels and the demand for the new economy critical materials. But the reality is that many investors are reluctant to talk openly about commodities because of the negative perceptions of the sector.

Asset managers inconsistent on labour rights: 2023 proxy voting results

Asset owners collaborating to influence labour rights in investee companies have another string to their bow with the release of the Committee on Workers' Capital report examining large fund manager voting performance.

COP28: Transition ‘out’ is now transition ‘away’

After COP28 Tim Hodgson says the investment industry needs to decide whether the transition away from fossil fuels will be too little, too late or whether net zero by 2050, with all the associated transformational consequences, is possible. Either way the industry needs to “get really good at intertemporal risk management”.

Previous