At COP28, financial sector innovation bolsters headlines

COP28 in Dubai had all the ingredients for both decisive action and controversy. Given the UAE’s status as a significant fossil fuel producer, it was seen by many as the host likeliest both to commit significant resources as well as face criticism from climate campaigners.

Perhaps inevitably, both happened.

First, action. COP28 produced the most deliberate commitment from participants to move away from fossil fuels, in the form of its annual “global stocktake”. From day one, the UAE made it clear it would deliver on expectations for large scale financial commitments, demonstrated by the Emirati government’s pledge to create a $30 billion climate-focused investment fund, Alterra. This move was met with widespread praise and announcements of further support from other nations. Less noticed, but just as significant, was the announcement the following day that the multilateral funds set up under UN auspices would begin to coordinate their mitigation efforts.

Later, controversy. By day four, headlines quoting COP28 president, Sultan al-Jaber, as saying that there is “no science” behind calls to phase out fossil fuels cast a wide shadow.

As expected, the early news out of Dubai was both powerful and contentious. Looking back, however, there is much more cause for hope than doubt that can be taken from COP28.

Those on the ground, myself included, bore witness to a significant level of innovation on display, evidence of how much deep thinking has been going on behind the scenes in the finance sector. The launch of a climate finance new think thank, the Global Climate Finance Centre, hosted by the UAE’s Abu Dhabi Global Market and co-funded by ADQ, Blackrock, HSBC, Ninety One and others, was also a much noticed early announcement.

Sponsored Content

Elsewhere, participants delved into various novel investment strategies aimed at addressing the most critical global concerns. Among the proposals explored were specialized food and agriculture funds, notably from Principal Asset Management and Federated Hermes. These funds, aligning with the newly introduced TNFD regulations, aim to channel investments to improve food security for the world’s most vulnerable populations. Additionally, innovative approaches from State Street involving agricultural mortgages and the utilization of securitization techniques were discussed as mechanisms to increase financial flows for smaller-scale farmers.

In the race to achieve the ambitious goals set last week, allocating capital to high-emitting sectors will remain critical to real-world decarbonization. The role of private equity in this effort was a focal point for many. Multiple participants engaged in discussions centered around where private capital can make the most impact, particularly toward hard-to-abate assets that need to make the transition from “grey to green” The desire from investors to look beyond the consensus view on the role private markets can play in helping transition energy production towards a more sustainable mix was evident.

By the time the final text and global stocktake was published, it was clear that the intense multilateral effort had produced further progress, albeit after arduous negotiations. Were I focused on the short term, COP28 achieved too little. But, zooming out, I sense there are more capital and countries committed to this effort than ever before, and explicit mention of the shift away from fossil fuels is a sign of more to come. Furthermore, the work being done on the sidelines by the investment community bodes well for the effort to reach net zero.

From this point on, it will be incumbent on all those who made COP28 headlines – governments, corporates, and investors alike, to follow through with concrete action that helps build stakeholder trust in the multilateral process, and in the ability of business leaders to deliver change.

Olivier Lebleu is senior advisor at FCLTGlobal.

Leave a Comment

TPA to usher in clearer accountability at CalPERS

TPA to usher in clearer accountability at CalPERS

CalPERS chief investment officer Stephen Gilmore said the $650 billion fund’s upcoming shift to a total portfolio approach will sharpen investment accountability and help it focus capital allocation decisions on fund-level objectives.

Sort content by

Active US large cap adds nothing

Active investing in US large caps has detracted value from US pension fund portfolios and exposures should be indexed, according to new research by CEM Benchmarking. This could result in huge cost savings and have implications for how pension funds spend their active budget.

KLP shows the active side of passive

Norway’s fund for local government employees and healthcare workers, KLP, abides by strict internal ESG principles. Sarah Rundell looks at how this translates to investments in emerging markets, its view of indexes and a concentration of manager relationships.

Past returns: don’t even guide the past

The Thinking Ahead Institute's Tim Hodgson argues that past returns were over-stated, and future returns will be lower. More accurately, total value created will need to increase for shareholders to retain the same amount of value as previously.

Future Fund adds risk and liquidity

The Future Fund is adding risk to its portfolio, and focusing on liquidity, as part of a part of an ongoing strategy to free up more capital in the portfolio in the event of a drawdown. It is in the midst of selling off a “large slice” of private equity assets on the secondary market and has bought listed equities in emerging markets in the past year.

Alaska focuses on risk, cautious outlook

A year ago, the Alaska Permanent Fund appointed its first chief risk and compliance officer, Sebastian Vadakumcherry. With current investment conditions, and a move to a more conservative outlook, the relationship between Vadakumcherry and CIO, Marcus Frampton is proving its worth. We look at the fund’s approach to risk, its outlook for capital markets, and how data will give it an edge.

Global critique calls for Aussie reform

A global working group of pension experts critiqued the Australian system at the recent ICPM meeting in Sydney. They emphasised a desperate need for the system to move from accumulation to retirement income, reduce complexity, focus on retirees (not 40-year olds) and be holistic. After all, they said, the purpose of a pension system is about paying pensions not investment.

Previous