Kotkin warns of Ukraine break up as key geopolitical risk

It is not war between Russia and Ukraine that investors should be concerned about, according to Professor Stephen Kotkin, but the destabilising effects of Russia’s actions that could impact globalisation and harm the west.

“The big geopolitical risk is not the war but that Ukraine gets broken up,” Kotkin, the John P Birkelund Professor in History and International Affairs at Princeton University, told Top1000funds.com in an interview. “A lot of what Russia could do could be very destabilising for investors. Investors should be in favour of cutting a deal.”

Kotkin who is a Russia expert and was shortlisted for the Pulitzer Prize for his book Stalin: Paradoxes of Power, said investors should not looking at the tension itself but what could be done by either side, in particular Russia breaking up Ukraine.

“Things like making their cities unliveable and poisoning the air and rivers, using cyber war to shut down the utilities and repercussions beyond Ukraine because everything is interconnected,” he said. “99% of the world’s communication goes through under sea cables. They are mapped and Russia knows where they are, they could cut them. Globalisation is worth a lot more to the west than it is to the Russians.”

Kotkin said this tension will not stop and Russia can come back again and again.

“I’ve been on record for seven years saying we should cut a deal with Russia over Crimea. It’s the big bargaining chip the western side has for a larger settlement to protect Ukraine but give Russia a stake in the deal.”

Sponsored Content

Kotkin, who among other things is the co-director of the program in history and the practice of diplomacy at Princeton and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, believes it is not in Putin’s interest to go to war.

“There is no support in Russia for a prolonged military war in Ukraine,” he said. “There are all sorts of reasons why Putin is in a bit of a bind here. He could undermine himself by going to war. This is a situation where we need to find a way out, not just for the west and Ukraine but for Russia as well.”

He also believes that President Biden also in a bit of a bind because many of the measures the US is threatening, like economic sanctions, against Russia could boomerang against the west.

“The pressure can be as long as Putin wants it to be. And if he withdraws temporarily he can ramp up again. On the sanctions being threated I don’t think it makes sense for Europeans to go without heat and shut their industry down by cutting off gas. It doesn’t make sense for Russia to be excluded from the SWIFT banking system. The international financial system is worth a lot more to the west than it is to Russia.”

He said one option with regards to the economic sanctions, which was effective during the cold war, could be technology transfer limits.

Generally he believes the west is in a better position now.

“Investors can only hope the Biden administration does up its game, that NATO and the EU stay united, that there is an off ramp and more importantly there is pathway to negotiation for a better settlement where Russia has a stake and Ukraine is protected at the same time.”

In the interview Kotkin also discusses the tension between Taiwan and China and reminded investors that the big problems are always perverse and unintended consequences.

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

Learning to see with a risk 2.0 lens

What happens if we examine past financial crises through a risk framework that acknowledges the adaptive, interconnected nature of real markets? Researcher at Thinking Ahead Institute Andrea Caloisi explores the application of a 'risk 2.0' framework to historical events. 

The future is a riskier place than the present

In this regular column for Top1000funds.com, Tim Hodgson of the Thinking Ahead Institute argues that the future is riskier not only because it is uncertain, but because the quantum of risk increases with time. He unpacks what this means for investors' risk analysis and the term 'risk premium'. 

AP4: Why a dynamic, shorter term allocation is paying off

Volatile markets have provided a rich hunting ground and opportunistic best ideas have come thick and fast for AP4’s new five-pronged global allocation made up of systematic equity, currency and rates, asset allocation, hedge funds/external mandates and analysis. Magdalena Högberg explains the risks and opportunities of the best ideas allocation.

Japan University Fund expands active allocation guided by risk factors

The $77 billion Japan University Fund is stepping up active strategies and introducing country-specific passive allocations as the young endowment, established only in 2022, builds out the policy portfolio. Co-CIO and the head of global investment department Naoya Sugimoto speaks about JUF's vision and manager expectations.

More funds consider TPA despite challenges

In January 2020, Roger Urwin laid down a call to action for asset owners and corporations to use the decade to drive greater wellbeing and wealth in the lives of their stakeholders. Now halfway through the decade, he reviews the state of play in this complicated picture.

Investors brace for volatility as tariffs spark global reckoning

The investors which will do well in times of market volatility will have the ability to do extensive, forward-looking scenario analysis, move assets tactically and dynamically and have liquidity. Top1000funds.com looks at investor reactions to tariff-induced market volatility.