MSCI shines light in tax gap

A quarter of companies in the MSCI All Country World Index have a large tax gap, paying an average rate of 14.3 per cent versus the 31.8 per cent that would be expected, based on the jurisdictions where they generate revenue.

A new report from MSCI ESG Research shows that MSCI ACWI Index constituents with a tax gap would have faced additional annual tax liabilities of up to $220 billion if the entire tax gap had been plugged by regulatory reform.

In the report, MSCI ESG Research states it has seen growing demand from institutional investors for data and metrics to assist in understanding their exposure to emerging risks from global tax policy shifts. In response, it has addressed tax transparency under the corporate behaviour theme and developed a new data set and scoring mechanism within its ratings framework.

This will be rolled out in phases over the next few years. The first phase is focused on flagging companies potentially facing high regulatory, legal and reputational risks on tax-related matters, based on MSCI ESG Research’s assessment of the gap between the companies’ reported tax rate and the estimated statutory rate based on where a company generates revenue.

Investors can use this tax-gap analysis for possible engagement and to develop a more targeted set of companies from a broad, diversified universe for further due diligence.

The research also outlines the attributes that would make a company place poorly in rankings from the analysis: a high estimated tax gap; a lack of transparency around the geographical breakdown of revenue (for example, if less than 50 per cent of total revenue is disclosed in country-by-country form); and involvement in tax-related controversies in the last three years, such as regulatory fines or ongoing litigation.

Sponsored Content

 

The full report, The Tax Gap: Regulatory responses and implications for institutional investors, can be accessed here.

 

One response to “MSCI shines light in tax gap”

  1. A lack of transparency surrounding the breakdown of a company’s revenue is certainly an attribute that will make it placed poorly in rankings. And, naturally any involvement and tax related controversies does not shine a good light either.

Leave a Comment

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

Long term lens shields Colorado from private credit jitters

As concerns in private credit mount, Colorado PERA CIO and COO Amy McGarrity says the pension fund isn’t seeing any strains in its growing allocation to the asset class, arguing that long-term investors are shielded from the risks because they can lock up their capital to weather market cycles.

Sort content by

UK local authority funds question “bigger is best”

UK local authority schemes are under pressure to merge. It’s their turn to suggest ways in which pooling investments, or adminstriation, could achieve the economies of scale necessary for survival, but many are resisting the notion that “bigger is better” when it comes to investments.   The United Kingdom’s local government pension schemes have begun

Finding wriggle room in North Dakota

The monthly income pouring into the $1.3-billion North Dakota Legacy Fund arrives as thick and fast as fracking technology and new pipeline networks can draw the state’s oil and gas reserves to the surface. But investment strategy at the fund, set up in 2008 when it was portioned 30 per cent of the tax dollars

Innovating investment beliefs

The concept of investment beliefs is the basis for strategic management and, while widely used in other parts of the world, is “innovative” from a US perspective, Allan Emkin, managing director of Pension Consulting Alliance, says. In a session at the Risk Summit, convened by World Pension Forum and Conexus Financial, publisher of conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, Emkin

Assessing reality in US public funds

Distinct regulation of United States public pension funds that links the liability discount rate to expected return on assets, rather than to the riskiness of their promised benefits, sets them apart – in a bad way. US public funds have underperformed other pension fund cohorts because of higher allocations to risky assets. Arguably, regulation is

Who should co-invest in private equity?

Some pension funds have hit on a lucrative strategy to extract more value from their private equity portfolios. The £34-billion ($51.6-billion) Universities Superannuation Scheme, the United Kingdom’s second biggest pension fund for university and higher education staff, is expanding a private equity co-investment strategy begun in 2008. It’s a model whereby schemes portion some investment

Norway opens a window on its global investment strategy

On March 8 when Yngve Slyngstad announced the annual results of Norway’s sovereign wealth fund, he did more than unveil a routine set of numbers. The chief executive of The Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), which manages the Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG), was also revealing the first results following what he called a “substantial” change

Previous