Don’t shy away from emerging markets in volatile times

Good quality, holistic research is more important than ever when assessing emerging markets investments with a sustainability lens, argues a portfolio manager at Newton Investment Management.
With volatility a strong theme of markets and economies over 2022, some investors have de-risked their portfolios and lost their stomach for riskier emerging markets investments. But a portfolio manager at Newton Investment Management argues emerging markets still offer value if you know how to find it.

Alex Khosla, portfolio manager in the emerging markets and Asia equities team at Newton Investment Management, said emerging markets cover a heterogeneous group of countries where four in every five people live today, accounting for about half of global GDP despite being serviced by about 10 per cent of equity allocations in the world.

There are also compelling reasons for sustainability-focussed investors to be in emerging markets, Khosla said. “Two-thirds of the world’s investment needs for a sustainable future, according to the UN, need to happen in developing countries,” he said.

Speaking with Conexus Financial managing editor Julia Newbould on podcast series Market Narratives, Khosla said Newton begins its search for emerging markets investments by looking at companies and asking three questions: What need is the company addressing? Is the company providing a new or innovative solution to that problem? Can you feel alignment, integrity and competence among the people running it?

 

Newton looks broadly at the industry and its relevance to the country and the region, asking questions like whether the company is investing capital in a way that will lower pricing to consumers, provide a particularly innovative solution or reach a new group.

This could include looking at whether offerings such as food or medicine or travel are a particularly pressing need in the targeted markets. Is the country facing problems with financial under-penetration? Are there negative externalities a venture, such as water intensity or biodiversity risks, and do they outweigh the benefits of the project? Is the company leading or lagging its industry in addressing these problems?

Sponsored Content

Newton also has well-resourced teams looking more broadly at things like geopolitical risks and their potential impact on different asset classes, leading the group to avoid or be particularly wary about investments in some countries or regions.

“Where you have weak institutions, that can result in things like kleptocracy and things like war, they’re often not great environments for businesses that are looking to try and sustainably solve and address needs in a society,” Khosla said.

Looking at management purpose involves analysing the alignment, integrity and competence of the people at the company, which helps ensure the company stays focussed on sustainable growth.

“Assessing management purpose is very hard, and it’s very qualitative but we do think it’s critical,” Khosla said. “We also think it’s why it’s important to have a team of investors that are trained across a wide degree of skill sets because some of these more qualitative things are difficult for investors trained to build spreadsheets.”

As an example of differentiating companies based on management, Khosla pointed to the solar industry which is increasingly important for renewable energy, and also increasingly crowded. But among the myriad companies in this space, it is a smaller number that are truly committed to innovating to reduce the cost curve, he said.

“Some companies are just there to empire build, and some companies are more interested in scale for scale’s sake, rather than really identifying where they can improve the industry’s cost profile by doing specific things around innovation,” Khosla said.

There are also examples of emerging markets companies “where the owners or the management of that company really found themselves in that industry because of some sort of patronage or some sort of link to a government that wasn’t because of their competence, it was because of other things,” Khosla said. “And we tend to believe that in the very long run those businesses are more likely to be found out.”

Differentiating between companies can be harder in some emerging markets, with limited data or limited voting posing difficulties for sustainability in particular. But these obstacles aren’t insurmountable, Khosla said.

“We do think there’s enough data now to–as long as you work hard and you keep plugging away–to start really trying to track company progress on whether they’re delivering…those sustainability goals.”

Active engagement on sustainability issues can also help drive emerging markets companies in a positive direction, he said, and also gives the investor the chance to analyse the management’s response.

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

Sovereign Development Funds: designing strategic investment institutions

The hunt for alpha is leading traditional investors toward more innovative strategies and operating models. And, significantly, one potential source of inspiration for long-term investors has come from an unconventional place: the community of sovereign development funds (SDFs). In this paper academics from Stanford University provide readers with analytical frameworks that can assist in the

Capitalising on institutional co-investment platforms

Co-investment is often perceived as referring to institutional investors investing alongside their external asset managers in companies, but increasingly it refers to investment responsibilities being shared among peer investors, as long-term institutional investors are forming co-investment partnerships with the specific objective of deploying capital collaboratively into attractive investment opportunities. These collaborative partnerships seem to be an

State pension funds tilt towards politically-connected stocks

It is well documented that local bias exists in US state pension fund holdings, but now an article in the Journal of Financial Economics (forthcoming) finds evidence not only of local bias, but bias towards politically-connected stocks.  Not only that, but the article finds that political bias is detrimental to fund performance. “Political bias is

The power of knowledge management

Funds management is often discussed in the context of it being part art and part science, however most of the literature centres around the science, the finance, of funds management. The premise of active management is that skills and knowledge are paramount to capturing excess returns above the benchmark. But despite this premise, little is

Worldwide diversity in funded pension plans

There is a huge diversity in pension system design across the globe, reflecting historical, cultural and institutional diversity. There is much to be learned by each of the different systems, so in order to compare the benefits of various systems, two authors from APG in the Netherlands postulate a new classification of four role models

Re-intermediating investment management

In this paper, Ashby Monk and Rajiv Sharma from the Global Projects Center at Stanford University, examine the balance of power among the various parties in the private assets investment food chain. They argue that fund managers have too much power, as do the consultants that act as gatekeepers to those managers. While the authors

Previous