Benchmarking infrastructure a step closer

The first valuation and risk measurement model created for unlisted infrastructure debt has been developed, with the release of a paper showing the valuation of illiquid infrastructure project debt, taking into account its illiquidity and the absence of market price feedback, can be done using advanced, state-of-the-art structural credit risk modelling.

The paper by EDHEC-Risk Institute is part of an ongoing research project aiming to create long-term investment benchmarks for investments in infrastructure.

EDHEC has previously said that improving investors’ access to infrastructure requires the creation of new performance measurement tools that can inform the asset allocation decisions of investors in infrastructure and help them integrate assets like infrastructure debt into their respective risk and return frameworks.

The paper proposes to address the challenges of illiquid investment performance measurement including the information scarcity of illiquid investments. Without market prices or large cash flow datasets, performance measurement is not straightforward. At the moment there is an absence of relevant performance measures.

This latest paper focuses on private project finance loans, as EDHEC says they constitute the largest proportion, by far, of illiquid infrastructure project debt, and are well-defined since Basel II.

The paper looks at the appropriate pricing models, return and risk models and defines minimum data collection requirements.

Sponsored Content

EDHEC shows that the valuation of illiquid infrastructure project debt, taking into account its illiquidity and the absence of market price feedback, can be done using advanced, state-of-the-art structural credit risk modelling, relying on a parsimonious set of empirical inputs.

Further, the data required to evaluate the performance of illiquid infrastructure project debt can provide the basis for a reporting standard for long-term investors.

Research director at EDHEC-Risk Institute in Singapore, Frederic Blanc-Brude said the model  is practical and useful, for example it predicts the probability of default in infrastructure project debt as reported by Moody’s even before calibration with actual defaults or cash flow data.

Blanc-Brude said in the coming months, EDHEC will continue to implement its roadmap to create infrastructure debt investment benchmarks, which includes data collection to document and calibrate cash flow volatility and the creation of a reporting standard, which is effectively covered by the data collection requirements identified in the paper.

 

The paper can be accessed below

Unlisted infrastructure debt valuation and performance measurement

 

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

EDHEC award-winning paper on dynamic allocation decisions

The Institute for Quantitative Investment Research (Inquire) Europe has recognised research by Professor Lionel Martellini, scientific director of EDHEC-Risk Institute developed in conjunction with Vincent Milhau, research engineer with EDHEC-Risk Institute. The paper, Dynamic Allocation Decisions in the Presence of Funding Ratio Constraints, can be accessed here. Inquire_Europe_Autumn_2009mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Towards a better benchmark for market valuations

Taking a three-year view of recent company earnings compared with price may be a more logical benchmark for market valuations, according to a paper from Wainwright Economics in the US. Wainright.pdfmrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Global regulation: not the time to lose interest

This paper by Pantheon Ventures argues there is an excellent case for appropriate global regulatory reform, but warns it must be proportionate and non-discriminatory, and it must acknowledge that the financial system is global.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Does Britain need a financial regulator?

Terry Arthur and Philip Booth from The Institute of Economic Affairs explore whether Britain actually needs a financial regulator, concluding among other things that the FSA “is simply the wrong model to generate appropriate rules and regulations”.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

SuperStream could save $20 bn: Ernst & Young

The $20 billion prize, provides a blueprint for implementing the Cooper Review-proposed SuperStream concept.

Revisiting global small caps

This research insight by MSCI, shows global small caps still exhibit distinct characteristics that provide opportunities for portfolio diversification and active management. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Previous