Pension transparency needs a benchmark

In a first formal collaboration, Top1000funds.com and CEM Benchmarking have teamed up to develop the Global Pension Transparency Benchmark (GPTB). The GPTB establishes a new global benchmark that brings a focus to transparency in a bid to improve pension outcomes for members.

Transparency, or lack of it around costs and other issues, has been a problem area for pension funds over many years, and in the industry there is room for improvement in this area. Transparency is a positive word – it is about being honest and open with stakeholders. With this benchmark we offer a standard for global pension systems and funds to aspire to, and in doing so emphasise the importance of the need for clarity and openness.

CEM has had a long history focusing on cost and financial value for money outcomes. This broadens that view and establishes a new global benchmark that also includes key inputs associated with value generation that are obtained from public disclosures such as  governance, strategy and structure.  It also incorporates sustainability/ESG which pension funds and their stakeholders increasingly consider to be an important  and necessary ‘value’ element.

Cost transparency emerged as an important issue for pension funds post-GFC and many in the industry championed it.  With this new benchmark we want to reframe the narrative away from a narrow and negative focus on costs to a more holistic and positive concept of transparency and include value generation, governance and strategy, and sustainability.

The GPTB, which will launch in February 2021, will initially rank 15 countries on public disclosures of key value generation elements for the five largest pension fund organisations within each country.

The GPTB focuses on the transparency and quality of public disclosures with quality relating to the completeness, clarity, information value and comparability of disclosures.

Sponsored Content

The overall country benchmark scores will look at four factors: governance and organization; performance; costs; and responsible investing, which are measured by assessing hundreds of underlying components.

Why is transparency important?

“A lack of transparency results in distrust and a deep sense of insecurity.” Dalai Lama

There is plenty of evidence that the lack of transparency has negative consequences for relationships and organisations of all types, whether they be individuals, governments, corporations, or pension funds.  Transparency is: “the right thing to do”, but there are many benefits beyond this simple moral imperative:

  • Transparency and accountability go hand in hand and lead to improved decision making
  • Improved clarity of purpose that comes from simplifying and communicating complex issues
  • Improved relationships and interactions across a broad spectrum of stakeholders including beneficiaries, plan sponsors, regulators, suppliers and concerned citizens
  • Ultimately, better outcomes through clarity of purpose, sound goals and accountability for progress.

We have been fortunate to have an esteemed advisory board – all with a unique perspective on the importance of transparency and reporting –who have been instrumental as we have been developing this concept.

The Global Pension Transparency Benchmark advisory board:

  • Keith Ambachtsheer, president, KPA Advisory Services; co-founder and board member, CEM, Canada
  • David Atkin, former chief executive Officer, Cbus, Australia
  • Lorelei Graye, founder, Adopting Data Standards, USA
  • Angélique Laskewitz, director, Association of Investors for Sustainable Development, The Netherlands
  • Neil Murphy, vice-president, communications, Investment Management Corporation of Ontario, Canada

Top1000funds.com and CEM Benchmarking have long had aligned goals – to highlight industry best practice and drive better pension outcomes globally – and we look forward to revealing more about our joint project in the coming months and we will detail the benchmark results, methodology and process next year.

Amanda White is editor of Top1000funds.com and director of institutional content at Conexus Financial; Mike Heale is principal at CEM Benchmarking.

 

Leave a Comment

NY Common joins allocator push on company AI transparency

NY Common joins allocator push on company AI transparency

The $273 billion New York State Common has upped the pressure on portfolio companies to report on how artificial intelligence usage is contributing to layoffs, as AI governance becomes a growing focus in the proxy voting and engagement activities of asset owners.

Sort content by

NBIM transparently explains half year results

The semi annual report of Norway’s sovereign wealth fund is testament to its commitment to transparency, unambiguously outlining the half year results which came in 0.04% under benchmark. The fund did benefit from a nearly 15% exposure to tech stocks, but was let down by returns in renewable energy infrastructure.

AP funds face consolidation as report flags scale and efficiency wins

A long-awaited review into Sweden's buffer funds suggests consolidation between the three Stockholm funds – AP1, AP3 and AP4 – stating that the advantages in terms of efficiency and scale outweigh the disadvantages of continued separation.

Same same, but different: Governance lessons from three markets

Despite global pension markets’ varying levels of maturity, the goal of combining portfolio resilience with meeting fund objectives is the same, and it can be achieved through different manifestations of governance structures.

Solid foundations allow Canadian funds to innovate and grow

The foundations of the modern Canadian pension fund industry were laid decades ago, and organisations today continue to reap the benefits. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium in Toronto heard that the potential of the industry is immense, built on solid principles and an embrace of new technology and processes.

Pioneers of the Canadian model say its principles are under siege

A founding principle of the Canadian pension system is under attack. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium in Toronto heard from four individuals who have been instrumental in making the system what it is today, and that the sound principles that made the system great need to be defended.

CalPERS mulls tying climate KPIs to incentive pay

CalPERS may tie the incentive pay of its staff to meeting climate KPIs in the near future. The fund's executive pay consultants also discussed other ways the fund should tweak incentive pay like adding an asset class investment performance weighting to the annual incentive formula.

Previous