Accountability, performance at the heart of Temasek’s three-way split

Dilhan Pillay

Singapore’s Temasek has unveiled its biggest organisational overhaul in more than a decade, splitting its investment portfolio into three entities to “sharpen” investment focus, boost accountability and align performance metrics. 

From April 2026, the S$434 billion ($324 billion) sovereign wealth fund will manage its investments via Temasek Global Investments, Temasek Singapore and Temasek Partnership Solutions, respectively looking after the three portfolio segments: global direct investments (40 per cent of the fund), Singapore-based portfolio companies (40 per cent), and partnerships, funds, and asset management companies (20 per cent).  

Temasek Holdings CEO Dilhan Pillay said the three investment segments have distinct attributes and “there are good reasons” behind the separation.  

“[Since our last restructure 11 years ago] we developed so many other capabilities to support our portfolio strategies, our investment strategies, and that’s really what we’ve been investing in – capabilities for the world that was changing, and the world that will continue to change,” Pillay told reporters last Friday. 

“In that period of change, we too need to change.” 

Temasek’s portfolio composition as at March 31. 2025. Source: Temasek

The nature of investments is the most notable difference: Temasek is typically a minority investor in its global direct investments segment and often leans into the expertise of like-minded partners, but it is a control investor in Singaporean companies and is looking to be more active in board nominations moving forward.

Performance metrics used to evaluate these investments also diverge. Financial return is the performance that matters the most in the global direct investments segment as Temasek is a shorter-term owner of these businesses, but for Singaporean companies the success is also hinged upon portfolio companies’ operating metrics including business transformation, capital structure optimisation and even talent development, Pillay said.  

In turn, different kinds of capabilities are desired in the three segments. It is crucial for the global direct investment team – consisting of 290 professionals – to source and execute the right deals and maintain sector expertise, while the Singaporean investment team needs to have knowledge around company restructuring and capital management.  

In a media release, the fund said the new structure would allow it to “support portfolio strategies for growth and returns, and perform with greater accountability and alignment”.  

Alongside Temasek International, which holds the group’s corporate functions, the four subsidiaries will sit under Temasek Holdings – a Singapore government-linked entity whose financials are subjected to certain audit and accountability requirements, known as the Fifth Schedule entity. All four subsidiaries are chaired by Pillay.  

Sponsored Content

The overhaul is a part of Temasek’s 10-year strategy, known as T2030, and offered a glimpse into the fund’s forward-looking investment philosophy. To weatherproof its portfolio, the fund is targeting a 60/40 split between the “resilient” and “dynamic” portfolio components.  

The resilient component will deliver a stable, narrower range of outcomes over time and include core Singaporean and global portfolio companies, “compounders” with long-term potential, partnership funds and asset management companies, private credit and core plus infrastructure. It has a 5 per cent target allocation to private credit compared to 2 per cent currently.  

The dynamic component will be companies with high growth prospects, including growth equity, public markets and liquid strategies, and opportunities identified by its innovation and emerging technologies team dedicated to scoping out future-facing solutions.  

Pillay said Temasek has been enhancing its capabilities in public markets during the last 18 months, which is crucial for liquidity and the fund’s triple-A credit ratings, and has already seen an “uplift in the performance”.  

Elsewhere in the portfolio, Temasek is holding a strategic review on how to better synergise between the dozen asset management companies it controls. The main asset management platform for Temasek is Seviora Holdings which has four subsidiaries, including Azalea which securitises its LP interest in private equity funds. Other companies include Aranda, a private credit offshoot carved out of Temasek’s in-house credit team which now manages a S$10 billion portfolio of its funds and direct investments.   

Temasek Global Investments will be led by Chia Song Hwee, who also becomes co-CEO of Temasek International this October. Temasek Singapore will be headed by chief financial officer Png Chin Yee. Rohit Sipahimalani remains chief investment officer of the group.  

Temasek invested S$52 billion and divested S$42 billion in the year to March 2025. The 10-year and 20-year total shareholder return – a compounded and annualised figure which includes dividends paid by Temasek and excludes investments from shareholders – is 5 and 7 per cent respectively in Singapore dollars.

Asset Owner:Temasek Holdings

Leave a Comment

Pension funds confront the question of who owns AI

Pension funds confront the question of who owns AI

As the use of AI within asset owners evolves, organisations are grappling with the governance question of where the strategy and accountability sit. Darcy Song looks at the treatment of AI organisationally within a number of high-profile funds, including OTPP, AustralianSuper, CPP and Norges Bank.

Sort content by

Who should co-invest in private equity?

Some pension funds have hit on a lucrative strategy to extract more value from their private equity portfolios. The £34-billion ($51.6-billion) Universities Superannuation Scheme, the United Kingdom’s second biggest pension fund for university and higher education staff, is expanding a private equity co-investment strategy begun in 2008. It’s a model whereby schemes portion some investment

Global CIO survey: lowered expectations

Connecticut-based financial services management consultant, Casey Quirk, and institutional investment specialist publication, top1000funds.com, joined forces in a global chief investment officer survey to measure the sentiment of asset owners, and the extent to which the 2008 crisis has had an effect on the behaviour of internal investment teams, their outlook and corresponding asset allocation. With

Railpen, the open DB fund with locomotion

Despite the constant pull on Railpen chief executive Chris Hitchen’s expertise in other directions, most recently helping to run NEST, the UK government’s new low-cost pension scheme, he is resolute that his primary task is ensuring Railpen, inhouse manager of the £19-billion ($30.4 billion) pension scheme for Britain’s rail industry, successfully delivers on its monthly

USS powers into diversity

In the past few years the £34-billion ($54.7 billion) Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) has substantially diversified its asset allocation, including a large alternatives allocation, and extended its investment team from 65 to 105. In the latest chapter of the fund’s investment department reincarnation, from October this year a separate but fully owned USS company, USS

Overseeing complexity with Rotman-ICPM

A week-long Board Effectiveness Program with peers from around the globe, including those from Canada’s HOOPP and Denmark’s ATP, has given AIMCo board member, Andrea Rosen, a new perspective on best practice. In a business environment where most people are working harder, multi-skilling, facing lower-than-necessary resourcing, staffing and margins, a week-long course could be viewed

Gunning for diversity, dynamism and due diligence

The new low-return, high-volatility environment requires broadly diversified portfolios, dynamic decision-making and rigorous due diligence, which is beyond the internal capacity of most small funds under $10 billion, warns Russell Investment’s global chief investment officer Peter Gunning. He says smaller funds must decide if it is cost effective and even possible to internally manage investment

Previous