Big owners should act like big owners

One of the key ways that institutional investors can promote a long-term orientation in the companies they invest, is by rejecting a company’s compensation plan if it puts too much emphasis on short-term results, says Bob Pozen, visiting senior lecturer at the MIT Sloan School of Management.
Writing in the Financial Analysts Journal, he says if institutional investors want companies to take a long-term approach to corporate growth, they should push for three-year performance period for determining cash bonuses.
He says long before any proxy vote fight is in the offering, institutional investors should push for their vision of sustainable long-term growth through engagement with the companies they own. And one of the most important ways to facilitate changing corporate behaviour to be more long-term in orientation is to shift companies away from basing their cash bonuses on only the prior year’s performance.
Another way is for investors to engage in the process of nominating directors with a long-term approach to corporate growth.
“Big owners should act like big owners,” he says. “In that role, institutions should carefully study any proposal’s impact on a company over many years, depending on the type of company and its history of delivering long-term results.”
In the article, Pozen who is the former chairman of MFS Investment Management and is also a senior lecturer at the Harvard Business School as well as a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, looks at the role of institutional investors in curbing corporate short-termism. He argues that institutional investors are not active in taking an outspoken position for or against activist hedge funds.
“If institutional investors are serious about supporting long-term value creation, they can pursue this goal through various forms of investor engagement with the company. Then, if a hedge fund launches a proxy fight, they should vigorously participate to make sure the outcome promotes corporate growth over the next several years rather than the next few months.”

To access the full article click here

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

The future belongs to investors who can adapt

The future belongs to investors who can adapt

Canada's HOOPP has officially adopted the total portfolio approach since the start of 2026. Unpacking the move, the fund's managing director and head of total portfolio group Jacky Lee writes that while the approach doesn't magically make the return better, the fact that it frees the investment team from outdated processes and gives investment leaders the flexibility to act is what gives it an edge.

Sort content by

The ‘Divest Invest’ premium

A sample Divest Invest portfolio outperformed under climate-change modelling, when compared with a more traditional allocation exposed to fossil fuels and lacking tilts towards climate solutions.

We need to be better than ‘optimal’

An over-reliance on mean-variance optimisation has led to portfolios that fail to take into account the radical complexity of the real world and embrace ‘pretentious and unhelpful symbols’.

Dangers, and opportunities, lie ahead

Against a backdrop of geopolitical tumult, Mercer’s Phil Edwards outlines four developments investors will need to consider when building and adjusting their portfolios for the year ahead.

Tough climate marks value in governance

The link between better governance and stronger returns lies somewhere between faith and fact; however, in a historically tough climate, the argument for best practice seems overwhelming.

CalPERS did well to snuff out tobacco

We can debate the certainty of risks and returns, but maintaining that investment in tobacco is in the best interests of ordinary workers is clearly becoming an increasingly difficult position.

Politics matter

In exercising fiduciary duty, it is not the origin of long-term value drivers that matters, but their financial materiality, and that includes ESG says Will Martindale, head of policy at PRI.

Previous