OPTrust: hiking rates because of the oil shock is a mistake

To navigate rates and inflation uncertainty, OPTrust is leaning into dynamic portfolio construction, actively managed options, and a total portfolio approach supporting the belief that inflation resilience is built into how portfolios are constructed not an individual asset or exposure.

Central banks have adopted a hawkish tone when it comes to interest rates, with many suggesting the cost of borrowing is likely to rise in response to the economic fallout from the war in Iran and inflation coming down the line.

But David Ross, senior executive managing director and global head of liquid assets at Canada’s $27 billion OPTrust which invests the assets of the OPSEU Pension Plan, argues that as monetary policy makers navigate the twin challenges of inflation and lacklustre growth, they may not pull the lever up on interest rates after all.

Today’s environment doesn’t compare with the pandemic because inflation from the oil shock might not be a long-term problem, and higher interest rates will impact growth.

He argues that everyone thought that inflation caused by the Covid supply shock was transitory. It turned out to be much stickier, but primarily because of the huge fiscal stimulus governments unleashed. Not only does this suggest governments stepping in to protect people may result in embedded inflation. It also suggests that higher interest rates might not be necessary, he says.

Sponsored Content

“Hiking rates aggressively off the back of an oil price shock is a mistake,” he says. “We should also remember that, before the conflict erupted, yields were falling through the month of February as the market priced in concerns that accelerating AI adoption could push unemployment higher and slow growth, and that this was drawing a central bank response.”

Inflation busting strategies

That is not to say OPTrust isn’t preparing for higher inflation.

Inflation protection doesn’t come from exposure to a single sector like oil price futures or investing in energy companies, he continues. Rather, inflation resilience is baked into portfolio construction and diversification.

One of the most direct ways to acquire inflation protection is an inflation swap, directly priced off inflation so the value changes in line with changes in inflation.

“These instruments are helpful, but they can be costly to hold over time and require a lot of liquidity. It’s not something you want to use as your only source of inflation hedging.”

Elsewhere, infrastructure can be a long-term inflation hedge, especially if the asset has an income that is tied to rising prices like a toll road. But he warns the challenge here comes from the fact that like many investments, the investment cycle will have an impact on the degree of inflation protection the asset gives – an asset will likely offer inflation protection in the long term, but in any given year, might not.

“In portfolio construction everything has a place and different assets play different roles, offering differing inflation protection at different points in time. The valuation of infrastructure assets, including renewable assets, changes over time and is dependent on economic and investment cycles.”

Although still challenging, he says managing inflation becomes a little easier under TPA.

OPTrust launched the top-down strategy last year, whereby investment decisions are now made according to total-fund outcomes rather than individual asset-class performance. The process has included introducing factor exposures to inflation, equity, rates and currency risk premia.

TPA gives the internal trading team the ability to manage inflation dynamically, shifting focus across asset classes as inflation opportunities and risks change in commodities, equity and nominal and real return bonds which each react to rising prices in different ways, he says

“Some things react quickly to inflation and some things more slowly,” he explains, adding. “No one has perfect foresight and there are lots of challenges when it comes to managing inflation through markets, but sometimes things are obvious and you don’t need to be a rocket scientist to avoid it. With TPA, we are no longer locked into a framework based on 20-year assumptions that has made making the changes we need to, more cumbersome.”

TPA, he says, allows the team to look at the risks and opportunities; see what is cheap and expensive and react dynamically and doesn’t change risk and liquidity limits, or operational governance.

As volatility and uncertainty continues to grip markets OPTrust is benefiting from hedges in the liquid portfolio.

The actively managed options strategy isn’t exotic, but primarily involves put options that were positioned earlier in the year to manage downside risk. Elsewhere, the team has dialled down exposure to emerging market equities which have struggled since the war. He also has an eye on other sectors that are vulnerable in the current crisis like semiconductor companies because they are reliant on imported helium used for cooling.

“Geopolitics but also AI and the energy transition, make the separation clearer between firms with plans for the future, and the financing in place to support those plans, and the companies that are unprepared, and not in a position to pivot. Expect an acceleration in the distinction between winners and losers. It makes investing exciting,” he concludes.

Leave a Comment

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

How CPP is evolving risk management for a faster, more interconnected world

In an environment where multiple risks are emerging and their effects are compounding on the portfolio, CPP Investments' chief risk officer Priti Singh says the $572 billion fund is rethinking risk management from the ground up, shifting from reaction to preparation and embedding risk thinking earlier in investment decisions. She speaks to Amanda White about the fund's risk approach.

Sort content by

In-house investment and alternatives: How Germany’s WPV sets itself apart

Germany's WPV stands out amongst peers for its in-house investment management and the fact that half of its €6 billion ($6.9 billion) portfolio is invested in alternatives. Managing director Sascha Pinger explains how these characters give the fund an edge in Germany's competitive environment for industry pension funds.

Veritas plans equity boost as Finland rewrites pension rules

Finland’s €5 billion ($5.8 billion) Veritas Pension Insurance Company is preparing to increase its public equity allocation by 15 per cent in line with new regulations in the country that aim to improve the sustainability and financial stability of the pension system. CIO Laura Wickström explains her approach.

Innovation pays off at Iowa PERS with an alpha-producing TAA

An internally developed tactical asset allocation at IPERS has produced more alpha than any other active management allocation in the second half of 2025. It's the first time the investment team have gone live with an internal idea that has made money in its early months.

Alaska’s APFC: Why any nudge lower in private equity will be slow progress

As Alaska's APFC mulls trimming its 18 per cent private equity allocation, the reality of getting legacy managers off the books is proving more challenging, according to deputy CIO, private markets Allen Waldrop. In an interview with Top1000funds.com, he also shares his view on secondaries and manager selection. 

How CalPERS aims to add 50-60 bps using TPA

Stephen Gilmore says he can add 50 to 60 basis points to portfolio returns by using a total portfolio approach. In a long interview, Amanda White spoke to the CIO of CalPERS about why a TPA mindset can add value, simplify accountability and open new opportunities for investments.

Why West Virginia’s CIO is worried about its China divestment directive

The $28 billion West Virginia Investment Management Board will divest from Chinese state-owned companies and CIO Craig Slaughter has reservations about the decision. He outlines in an interview with Top1000funds.com about why the directive is an extension of a big threat facing investors: a decline in liberal democracy. 

Previous